Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quit While You're Ahead, Rudy
The Evening Bulletin ^ | 02/12/2007 | Joe Murray

Posted on 02/12/2007 5:24:32 PM PST by NapkinUser

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last
To: PhiKapMom
Trying to stifle debate is not Conservative and wanting everyone to march in lockstep is also not Conservative.

Well, we have a very different view of these threads. IF I was going to say that anyone was trying to stifle debate I would say it was the Rudy supporters, but I don't think anyone is consciously attempting to do that.

We aren't stifling debate just because we don't come into Rudy threads shaking our pom-poms and rah-rah-Rudying. We are debating his stance on the issues or giving our opinions. You might disagree with the opinions, but that in no way stifles the debate on the threads.

As Jim Robinson has said, we are ALL conservatives here on this forum, but it would be a freaking miracle if we all agreed on everything. I wouldn't insult my fellow Freepers by even suggesting there is any lock-stepping going on around here.

121 posted on 02/12/2007 11:06:58 PM PST by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood
I just think some people here are totally freaking out. It has gone beyond debate to ridiculous fear-mongering and party-splitting. Some of these critics are coming off poorly and their message is getting lost in their emotional rhetoric.

I think that Rudy supporters are totally writing all opposition off as being 'the fringe element'. There is always a 'fringe element' ready to go off on any topic. Those people are loud and sometimes obnoxious, but there are very many reasonable Freepers who have objections to Rudy being our President. Take a look at the Freeper polls. We aren't fear-mongerers and we don't want a candidate that is so divisive that he does split the party. 'The Party' has not picked our nominee yet. This is the time to discuss our choices for nominee and to discuss their views on the issues that are important to each of us.

122 posted on 02/12/2007 11:32:49 PM PST by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Dreagon

> Guiliani simply can't win. He should save himself and his party the hassle and end this now.

The more I think about it, the more I believe both Giuliani and McCain are actually the stalkinghorses for the *real* Republican candidate, who has yet to reveal him/herself.

They are there to draw fire from Billary and Obama, and cause either/both to peak too early...

Brilliant strategy, worthy of the GOP.


123 posted on 02/12/2007 11:38:30 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
Brilliant strategy, worthy of the GOP

Somehow I doubt that. The unofficial moniker of the GOP is "The Stupid Party".

There's a reason for that, my friend.

L

124 posted on 02/12/2007 11:46:00 PM PST by Lurker (Europeans killed 6 million Jews. As a reward they got 40 million Moslems. Karma's a bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
A president's primary function is the safety and security of our country.

McCain fits that, then...

P.S. I know a bit about national security. Rudy is not even close to John McCain.

Van

125 posted on 02/13/2007 3:19:59 AM PST by Van Jenerette (U.S.Army, 1967-1991, Infantry OCS Hall of Fame, Ft. Benning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ErieGeno
Thanks...too much posturing, not enough substance.

Van

http://www.jenerette.com

126 posted on 02/13/2007 3:21:30 AM PST by Van Jenerette (U.S.Army, 1967-1991, Infantry OCS Hall of Fame, Ft. Benning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: don-o
I have stated that a Giuliani run will result in a loss of McGovernesque proportions.

This is Rudy.

This is George.

Yea you're likely right. LOL :>}

127 posted on 02/13/2007 3:45:06 AM PST by cva66snipe (Rudy, the Liberal Media's first choice for the GOP nomination. Not on my vote not even in Nov 2008..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Why are you not supporting Duncan Hunter? He is the real conservative in this race.


128 posted on 02/13/2007 3:45:38 AM PST by panthermom (Duncan Hunter 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sun

If you took Duncan Hunter's views and we changed him from a congressman to a Governor, people would be doing cartwheels over him. I don't understand it. Don't we pick our candidates on their platform? I cannot understand discounting him as a viable candidate because he's a congressman. I believe he has great leadership qualities.


129 posted on 02/13/2007 3:57:44 AM PST by panthermom (Duncan Hunter 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Pretty good, there.


130 posted on 02/13/2007 4:21:49 AM PST by don-o (Duncan Hunter for President. Inform yourself. You won't have to hold your nose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Yes...Alhough I found the "we're gonna get you if you run, Rudy" tone taken by this columnist somewhat amusing.

I'm not a Rudy supporter...I don't like any of the current candidates (Run Newt, Run) but the degree of hostility shown by so many conservatives on this board is interesting. Admdst all the blather about finding the new Reagan, they're overlooking some of the basic tenets of Reaganism. Speak no ill of a fellow Republican and let the market sort things out.

If Rudy wins...he wins.


131 posted on 02/13/2007 4:38:29 AM PST by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Pretty good, there.

A while back I kept trying to think of who he reminded me of. I knew it was a face I'd seen many years before :>} Rudy would do to our nation what Taxquist did to our state. Not on my vote he won't.

132 posted on 02/13/2007 4:42:43 AM PST by cva66snipe (Rudy, the Liberal Media's first choice for the GOP nomination. Not on my vote not even in Nov 2008..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

You would think that some people around here didn't learn ANYTHING from the last election.

When Pubbies behave like Dims, the voters choose the Real Thing rather than the pretender.

Let's examine the record for the last 30 years, shall we?

1976 - Moderate Pubbie vs. Democrat. Pubbie loses.
1980 - Conservative Pubbie vs. Democrat. Pubbie wins.
1984 - Ditto
1988 - Moderate Pubbie ( hand-picked replacement for previous conservative Pubbie) vs. Democrat. Pubbie wins.
1992 - Moderate Pubbie vs. Democrat. Pubbie loses.
1996 - Moderate Pubbie vs. Democrat. Pubbie loses.
2000 - Conservative Pubbie vs. Democrat. Pubbie wins.
2004 - Conservative Pubbie vs. Democrat. Pubbie wins.

Run Lefty Rudy against Hillary and Hillary will walk away with the election.

Why not run a real conservative? Reagan showed how it's done.


133 posted on 02/13/2007 4:58:25 AM PST by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Skip Ripley
Speak no ill of a fellow Republican and let the market sort things out.

He didn't mean lay down and let the party run all over you. BTW those who use that quote forget it was one GHW Bush who flamed Reagan up one side and down the other. Then after replacing Reagan tore down all he did. I think that quote is being used for a purpose it was never intended for. Reagan would have likely been talking pretty ill against the GOP of the past 11 years had he been dealing with them. He sure would not have wasted a majority in both houses.

I would have loved to have seen Reagan handling ones like Specter. LOL Speak no ill? Yea sure. The party needs some hostility. IT IS DEAD! Maybe some hostile voters who are real sick and tired of things can wake it up again to something besides the Democratic Party's doormat it has become.

134 posted on 02/13/2007 5:02:41 AM PST by cva66snipe (Rudy, the Liberal Media's first choice for the GOP nomination. Not on my vote not even in Nov 2008..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

The older I get the more I love his music. Thats life comes to mind, It was a very good year as well.


135 posted on 02/13/2007 5:03:24 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Van Jenerette
I have to question any man who would pay for the 'death' of his own grandchild.

*********

Amen. Giuliani should drop out of the race.

136 posted on 02/13/2007 5:05:46 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: imahawk

"It was a very good year" and "One more for the road" are probably my top picks. He played the latter in this movie where he's a down and out bar pianoman, and it was really cool. I'm not sure what the movie was called.


137 posted on 02/13/2007 5:07:04 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
The president appoints SCOTUS that can send the abortion issue back to the states where they belong. Most states will overturn Roe v Wade. But, I am not a one issue voter, and a mans character plays the greater part of my decision as who to vote for.

Rudy has no apparent moral values. He has not been faithful to his church or wives, and therefore IMHO cannot be trusted with the country. This just for starters, there is the gun issues, and his liberal friends that get appointments etc.
138 posted on 02/13/2007 5:11:56 AM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

You don't get it...debate the ideas, not the individuals. Too many seem to say "Rudy isn't 100% conservative, so I'm going to dreg up whatever chunk of garbage, rumor or innuendo I can about his personal life to smear him"

THAT'S the kind of crap the democrats pull.

But, maybe that's the way politics works. If your candidate isn't popular enough to out poll the front runner, attack the front runner to bring him back to you. Of course that tactic does nothing to improve the process and does much to harm it, but that's ok....a real conservative can win then!


139 posted on 02/13/2007 5:21:44 AM PST by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Skip Ripley

Are you saying that a candidates personal beliefs and behavior does not matter, and should not be brought out?


140 posted on 02/13/2007 6:19:28 AM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson