Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: captjanaway
"...He pointed to the civil rights movement and the Vietnam War as issues where young people had a voice. "I think lifting up those examples of where participation has led to positive change is absolutely critical," he said...."

Great example here of why liberals should NEVER be allowed to hold office of the Presidency or make any decisions of any sort in this country regarding military or foreign policy affairs. This is from another post A Parallel to "Gathering Of Eagles." What did the North Vietnamese think of the antiwar movement? today:

A LOT of parallels to current events here for some of the younger folks who do not know what REALLY went on in the past, and WILL go on now ... IF we do not stand-up and speak-up.

What did the North Vietnamese leadership think of the American antiwar movement?

Bui Tin, a former colonel in the North Vietnamese army, answers these questions in the following excerpts from an interview conducted by Stephen Young, a Minnesota attorney and human-rights activist [in The Wall Street Journal, 3 August 1995]. Bui Tin, who served on the general staff of North Vietnam's army, received the unconditional surrender of South Vietnam on April 30, 1975. He later became editor of the People's Daily, the official newspaper of Vietnam. He now lives in Paris, where he immigrated after becoming disillusioned with the fruits of Vietnamese communism.

Question: How did Hanoi intend to defeat the Americans?

Answer: By fighting a long war which would break their will to help South Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh said,

"We don't need to win military victories, we only need to hit them until they give up and get out."

Q: Was the American antiwar movement important to Hanoi's victory?

A: It was essential to our strategy. Support of the war from our rear was completely secure while the American rear was vulnerable. Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American antiwar movement. Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda, and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses. We were elated when Jane Fonda, wearing a red Vietnamese dress, said at a press conference that she was ashamed of American actions in the war and that she would struggle along with us.

Q: Did the Politburo pay attention to these visits?

A: Keenly.

Q: Why?

A: Those people represented the conscience of America. The conscience of America was part of its war-making capability, and we were turning that power in our favor. America lost because of its democracy; through dissent and protest it lost the ability to mobilize a will to win.

34 posted on 02/12/2007 4:15:49 PM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel
A Parallel to "Gathering Of Eagles." What did the North Vietnamese think of the antiwar movement?

Great post, rlmorel, thanks!

43 posted on 02/14/2007 9:14:16 AM PST by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson