Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said Mitchell can be called as a witness but he wouldn't allow Libby's attorneys to ask about her inconsistent statements."

What? Nobody's allowed to question little miss crater-face's public pronouncements? Why should that arrogant skank get a pass?

7 posted on 02/12/2007 2:31:57 PM PST by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: paddles

Good damn question.


11 posted on 02/12/2007 2:32:58 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: paddles; Ernest_at_the_Beach

I don't think they have to ask about her inconsistent statements. Just play the Imus tape and ask her if she said it. Yes or no. Then ask her if she ever told any other reporter or talked with any other reporter about Plame working at the CIA.

She will screw up in some way when she answers, which will open the door for the questioning, because she brought it up.

Of course, my courtroom trial experience is limited to watching Perry Mason and a few other TV attorney shows, so I might be a little off in my analysis.

;-)


32 posted on 02/12/2007 2:47:33 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson