Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B-Chan
The last time I checked rape wasn't a Constitutional form of punishment.

Nor is sympathy required by the Constitution.
21 posted on 02/12/2007 11:28:19 AM PST by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: P-40

No, it is God that requires that we have sympathy for prisoners. I'd be happy to point out chapter and verse if you like.


25 posted on 02/12/2007 11:29:30 AM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: P-40
Nor is sympathy required by the Constitution.

True, but then that is due through the command of much higher authority.

85 posted on 02/12/2007 11:46:42 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: P-40

Anal rape is agreed to be cruel and unusual punishment by pretty much anyone, I'd bet.


258 posted on 02/12/2007 1:13:51 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: P-40
"Nor is sympathy required by the Constitution." But justice is. And justice requires that the authorities must suppress rape; and that the assailant must be arrested, charged, and punished.

Since the assailant in this case is already in jail, punishment should obviously involve something more than jail or "more jail." I think the death penalty would arguably be justified, although on the merciful end of the spectrum, there's always flogging.

289 posted on 02/12/2007 1:45:22 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson