Nothing nonsensical about it. The post wasn't an attempt to bash Reagan, it was an attempt to show how a variety of things taken out of context (context including noting that Reagan didn't have control of both houses of Context) could have been used to bash Reagan.
Thus, you clearly misunderstood the point of the post.
Context? I have yet to see ANYONE refute the core claims of Spiff's chart. And the items listed are core conservative values. You're fairly liberal yourself, so don't try and discuss context on a subject you don't partake of yourself.