The law states that a woman has a right to choose. That puts the battle between the ears of a woman that actually is going through the process of making same said choice. I don't need that battle between my ears if I am not the one that controls the law.
I gave my specific view in a multiple choice question and if you found that post you would find that you are truly wasting your time.
It amuses me to allow those so high on their soapbox to continue the myopic view.
Someone already asked me and I answered that I am against abortion and that it should be illegal. That person had the sense to read enough to come up with four possible options that could be my personal beliefs and asked.
You wasted your time bickering.
We could pretend that I didn't just post this for you and we can bicker all night if you like or you can go back and see that my point is not so much these two issues and only these two issues.
The fact is that in the end, when the ticket is chosen, we compromise between who represents us overall and who represents the democrats overall.
Between now and then, we cna sling mud like the 'rats did in '04 or we can figure out that there has got to be a classier way to come up with who represents us.
As I said. You're a master of avoidance. You refuse to face up to two things:
A) That your phony position vis a vis abortion amounts to tacit approval of, and responsibility for, that practice.
and
B) The actual result of that approval...the mass brutal murder of 50 million of the most helpless and dependent human beings among us...and many millions more to come if it continues.