[RAY]

Thanks for posting. It seems I heard a senator emphatically say recently that the science on this issue was settle, that our "carbon" print was responsible for global warming.

But, as Rush points out, how can you say there is a consensus on this issue when at least 10% of the scientist disagree, and I say: not to mention another suspected considerable number who are afraid to disagree!

[okie01]

how can you say there is a consensus on this issue when at least 10% of the scientist disagree, and I say: not to mention another suspected considerable number who are afraid to disagree!

Moreover -- and more importantly -- the observable facts and basic common sense agree with the 10%.

1. The sun is quite obviously the most important single factor in regulating earth's climate.

2. Past warming cycles have been observed and proven to be caused by the sun's variance -- not by SUVs.

Given those two axiomatic truths how can so-called "global warming" be caused by man and be anything other than perfectly normal!?