Now I checked out his website and he's only touting 3 issues. Now fair trade, pro-defense, and being pro-life is fine, but it's all moot if government continues to confiscate our incomes and promote liberal policies that destroys families and promotes destructive lifestyles.
"Government exists above all to keep people safe in their homes and in the streets, he (Giuliani) said, not to redistribute income, run a welfare state, or perform social engineering."
I fail to see how Rudy's gun-control policies are an example of how government exists to keep people safe in their homes.
And government exists to reinforce and protect the RIGHTS of its citizens. Never forget that.
How about keeping unborn children safe in their wombs?
How about not infringing upon a law-abiding citizen's 2nd Amendment rights?
How about not running a virtual POLICE-STATE (nyc) and cooking the crime books in order to ahcieve the appearance of a lower crime rate?
How about not running a virtual welfare state and redistibuting citizens tax dollars to the illegal aliens you allow into our midst?
How about not using social engineering to help promote the homosexual agenda?
How about it RINO-rudy?
Now I checked out [Duncan Hunter's] website and he's only touting 3 issues. Now fair trade, pro-defense, and being pro-life is fine, but it's all moot if government continues to confiscate our incomes and promote liberal policies that destroys families and promotes destructive lifestyles.
I'm not that familiar with Duncan Hunter myself, he's a Californian and I don't know much about California Republicans and their politics.
But I don't think, offhand, that anyone to the right of Ahnuld would be much in favor of confiscatory tax policies, even in California, home of the original tax revolt.
Are you saying Hunter, despite taking a pro-life position, is also pro-gay and a social liberal? I wouldn't know, but have you seen something in his record? The candidates' ACU ratings are here: