It's illustrative how people can get caught up in their own arguments to the point of absolute contradiction. She thinks Edward's blogger did the right thing, so therefore one would think in her book, McCain's blogger should be Ok. But she flies into a rage and in the heat of the moment demands that the other guy should condemn McCain and his blogger.
And of course, she's supposedlly doing this for the benefit of the audience. Her own mind is made up. She just wants to convince the world to vote Democratic by throwing bombs over this tiny, inconsequential piece of trivia.
I'm hitting the TV's off button quite frequently these days.
Did I forget to mention the whole thing is absolutely pointless? Why would anyone want to line up on either side of this silly debate? To cheer-on either side is to participate in the attempted manipulation of the public mind. "Hey, we're better manipulators than you are, and to heck about what's good for the taxpayer." Just bamboozle them with our slant and hope they'll believe it, so we can retain or obtain power.