Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"unconstitutional, according to three University of Wisconsin-Madison law professors."

No. Felons lose their rights upon conviction. It's called attainder and goes way back in English common law. There is nothing unconstitutional about requiring them to wear the things.

Looks like it applies to all of them though, not just pedophiles. I have zero respect for WI's "sex" laws. Getting caught pissing in the bushes is a sex crime. Two teenagers 17 y/o doing it is a serious child sex crime. Sofar there's at least 2 couples that got engaged in HS, parents knew and were planning a wedding, girl got pregnant and the DA charged and convicted the guy with criminal child sexual assault. Coward Thompson refused to pardon the one. I really hate these moralists as much as the jihadis. They have as much compassion, and moralality as any wahabist jihadi. They're just bigger cowards than their religious counter parts are.

32 posted on 02/09/2007 6:35:34 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
Two teenagers 17 y/o doing it is a serious child sex crime.

How does that work? Does each get charged with abusing the other?

(Never mind, that's a rhetorical question. We all know who gets charged in this nation of Oprah watchers.)

-ccm

60 posted on 02/09/2007 9:09:59 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson