To: supercat
"Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the people with FFLs who do not engage in storefront sales are harming anyone in any fashion whatsoever (aside from making Brady et al. nervous, of course)?"Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the people who drink and drive are harming anyone in any fashion whatsoever (aside from making other drivers nervous, of course)?
To: robertpaulsen
Drinking and driving ARE overt, actual actions that are illegal and life-threatening. Illegal driving IS an overt deadly act.
Owning a gun license - and the reason we need a license at all could be debated!, and selling arms, is NOT life-threatening to anyone but a person who wants to seize weapons.
Name ANY of these FFL owner-retailers who has done ANYTHING illegal or threatening ..... to ANYONE other than a burglar or rapist who breaks in their house.
44 posted on
02/09/2007 7:52:12 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: robertpaulsen
"Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the people with FFLs who do not engage in storefront sales are harming anyone in any fashion whatsoever (aside from making Brady et al. nervous, of course)?" Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the people who drink and drive are harming anyone in any fashion whatsoever (aside from making other drivers nervous, of course)?
I'm sorry, but that is a really stupid analogy.
64 posted on
02/09/2007 9:39:49 AM PST by
jmc813
(Please check out www.marrow.org and consider becoming a donor. You may save a life.)
To: robertpaulsen
I'm going to have to agree with the others, that was a rotten analogy.
Private FFL holders are not comparable to drunken drivers.
I think that you can easily admit that much.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson