Hard to believe this is a conservative forum. I see an activity and call it for what it is -- dishonest -- and you compare me to Muslims and Marxists and say that I favor the use of deceit and force to correct it? A little over the top?
Look. Instead of calling me names and categorizing me, why don't you try explaining to me why I'm wrong. Tell me why that activity is honest and aboveboard. Noble, even. The spirit of capitalism, or something.
C'mon. Grow a pair. Quit hiding behind your insults. Put me in my place -- tell everyone why you think lying to acquire a license and cheating legitimate dealers is perfectly OK with you.
How about you explaining why you think it a dishonest "abuse of the system"? What is the intened purpose of the system?
I didn't say that. Your reading comprehension is abysmal.
Look. Instead of calling me names and categorizing me, why don't you try explaining to me why I'm wrong.
I didn't call you names but I could show where you have already insulted me. You are always the first to go there.
Tell me why that activity is honest and aboveboard.
I asked you to show what or whose moral ethic this activity is in violation of. You chose not to give a substantive response.
C'mon. Grow a pair. Quit hiding behind your insults.
There you go again. There is no post of mine you can point to that is anything close to being this insulting. And it wasn't your first.
Put me in my place ...
I did that already by simply taking your own premises to their logical conclusion. You responded with unqualified agreement in one post.