Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Then why did 230,000 out of 284,000 "that far into it" suddendly decide they weren't?

Dang you're thick. As has been clarified a dozen times in this thread, the practical cost went from somewhere around $100/yr to having to maintain a storefront. Went from tolerable to intolerable. Didn't help that BATFE agents went around harassing many into bailing out.

Leave me out of this. YOU tell HIM it's not "a LOT" and its only "a few".

Kinda hard, as you're an incredibly prolific poster in this thread, baselessly insulting small-time FFLs in sweeping terms, and generally demonstrating your rank ignorance of the subject.

201 posted on 02/09/2007 6:30:29 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
"baselessly insulting small-time FFLs in sweeping terms"

Not I. Go back to post #31. HE said "a LOT"' of small-time FFLs are abusing the system.

You say it's only "a few", yet you cannot explain (without lying about required storefronts) why suddenly 230,000 FFLs went out of business.

(You have yet to admonish the poster who actually did the insulting. Hard to believe you're actually insulted.)

234 posted on 02/10/2007 5:56:56 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson