Posted on 02/08/2007 6:58:20 PM PST by Copernicus
ATF Commerce in Firearms PDF Report
The Gun Control Act of 1968 established the first comprehensive Federal licensing system for importers, manufacturers and dealers in firearms to the retail level. That system requires licensees to maintain detailed records on transactions in firearms, and subjects their business premises to inspection by the ATF.
From 1968 to 1993, THE PROCESS TO OBTAIN A FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSE WAS OVERLY SIMPLE. (emphasis added)
The annual fee WAS ONLY $10 for a license that authorized the person to ship, transport and receive firearms in interstate commerce and engage in retail sales. The statue required ATF to issue a license within 45 days to anyone who was 21 years old, had premises from which they intended to conduct business and who otherwise was not prohibited from possessing firearms.
The statute was designed TO LIMIT THE DISCRETION OF ATF IN DENYING LICENSES.
Over time the numbers of licensees began to swell until 1992 when the numbers reached over 284,000...............
In 1993, Congress increased the license application fee to $200 for three years.
Again, in 1994, Congress imposed requirements that applicants submit photographs and fingerprints to better enable ATF to identify applicants and new criteria that ensures that the business to be conducted would comply with all applicable State and local laws.....
From 1975 to 1992 the licensee population grew from 161,927 to 284,117...........
In 1993 and 1994, Congress added several safeguards to ensure only legitimate gun dealers obtain Federal licenses, including increased fees and certification requirements.
Following the ATF's implementation of those provisions the number of Federal firearms licensees DROPPED FROM 284,117 IN 1992 TO 103,942 IN 1999. OF THESE 80,570 ARE RETAIL DEALERS OR PAWNBROKERS.
Yes, basically. All the previous notions of the Founders was taken behind the barn and kilt with an axe by the great adoption of 1930's American socialism.
Conservatives have been traditionally railing against it ever since.
It's not dishonest, how is working to get a discount dishonest?
Now you're just making things up.
Who is talking about Type 03 holders? Not me. Not anyone else. Just you.
The rest of us are talking about Type 01 dealers. Those who acquire a Type 01 FFL to buy and sell guns, but only use it to buy guns at wholesale for themselves (and perhaps others)instead of going to a legitimate dealer and paying retail.
Now, you're telling me those legitimate dealers aren't upset by this practice?
What if they are? Are FFL's supposted to be some kind of government entitlement program?
Nope. Never saw it. Maybe you'd better point that out for me. Can you?
Geez Louise. For the gazillionth time, nobody's talking about repairing or customizing firearms. Of course it's not dishonest if all you are doing is repairing or customizing firearms.
We're talking about Type 01 DEALERS! Get it? DEALERS! NOT repairing. NOT customizing. DEALERS!
WTF? We're talking about DEALERS! Get it? DEALERS! Type 01 FFL DEALERS! Those who are aurthorized to buy and sell. DEALERS!
NOT collectors. Not repairers. NOT customizers. Type 01 DEALERS! Stay on topic.
"the BATFE unilaterally chose to limit "dealing" to storefronts with posted hours."
Link me to that, would you?
I understand. By the way, who said you had to rent retail space?
When it comes to acquiring a Type 01 FFL, Title 1 dealer, yes I am.
I think a Type 03 is just to buy. There's a whole bunch of Types. 9 or 12 or something like that.
Situational ethics? You don't seem to have any such qualms about it when it's the government doing it to claim they're "regulating commerce". Do you work for the government? What's the deal with all this concern about the retailers being upset? Was there some back room deal we don't know about that makes them think they're entitled to the exclusive right to sell firearms? What would be the purpose of that except to simply make firearms more expensive for the average citizen?
Bull. If I said, "Legit? No." then you'd have a point.
In my opinion, a person who acquires a Type 01 FFL just to buy guns cheaply at wholesale, with no intention of becoming a legitimate dealer, is being dishonest. He's cheating the legitimate dealers.
So what's your problem with them getting a Type 01 instead of a Type 03? What's the difference between them getting a Type 03 to buy, and getting a Type 01 to buy or sell, but not exercising the option to sell?
What's to prove? You buy a Type 01 FFL that says you intend to be a dealer, buying and selling guns, when your sole intent is to use that license to buy guns for yourself (and maybe a friend or two) at wholesale. That's not dishonest? Something needs to be proven here?
I have no doubt that you've accepted Jesus as your savior. Therefore, you're not a better or worse Christian than I am. We're both Christians, have both been saved, and will be having eternal political debates when we go home to God. ;-)
Then tell me you're a libertarian (or an Individualist or an Objectivist) and that you don't see a conflict at all between those philosophies and your faith.
I really, really, really don't want to start a Protestant/Catholic argument, so allow me to preface by saying that I have a world of respect for the Catholic Church, it's leadership and it's parishoners. I live in a predominantly Catholic area, most of my friends are Catholic, and I really respect the charitable works that the RC Church does.
That said, where you and I differ is that my faith is a "sola scriptura" one, in other words, we use the Bible alone in shaping our faith. While I respect the Catholic Chuch, I personally disagree with a faith that requires adherance to "man-made" rules. The scriptures point out the evils of this world and urge the reader to avoid sin at all cost and to repent to God when you succumb. The Bible does NOT advocate government interference in victimless sins.
My faith does, though respect the sanctity of life, and I would love to see abortion treated legally the same way murder is.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that you may be right, I may be wrong. Or I may be right and you may be wrong. But when it comes down to it, we both have been saved by our faith in Christ. We're both Christians. God doesn't give a crap about petty political issues.
Easily, since I never said they were.
The poster said FFL holders don't harm people. I agreed. I added that those who drink and drive don't harm others either.
I think that you can easily admit that much.
Just another part of THE LEGACY OF THE CLINTON'S.
The Co-Presidents want control, not just gun control.
Can you point to where is says that on the license?
All these different phrases to justify the dishonesty. "Working to get a discount". Good one.
Hard to believe this is a conservative forum sometimes.
You buy a Type 01 FFL that says you intend to be a dealer, buying and selling guns, when your sole intent is to use that license to buy guns for yourself (and maybe a friend or two) at wholesale. That's not dishonest? That's not cheating the legitimate dealers trying to make a living?
But, I suppose to someone like you, if it's legal that means FULL STEAM AHEAD!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.