Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney’s about-face on campaign funding
The Hill ^ | February 8, 2007 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 02/08/2007 4:10:32 PM PST by EternalVigilance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
One more example of how Mitt Romney manages to come down on both sides of every issue.

In this case, Romney's proposals predated McCain's attack on the First Amendment known as "McCain-Feingold," and perhaps were part of the inspiration for it. It was too radical even for McCain, though.

1 posted on 02/08/2007 4:10:34 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; Jim Robinson; Gelato; Spiff; Delphinium; narses; Waywardson; Broadside; Taxman

ping...


2 posted on 02/08/2007 4:11:43 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
He's going right. Hard right. That's good. Way good. Just like Reagan.

That's much better than starting right and going left, like McCain, or starting left and staying left like Giuliani.

3 posted on 02/08/2007 4:14:16 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Well, when Mitt has proven his mettle for a couple of decades like Reagan, have him come talk to us.


4 posted on 02/08/2007 4:16:16 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Thanks for the info. The more information we have on these "saviors from Hillary" the better.
5 posted on 02/08/2007 4:16:20 PM PST by samm1148 (Pennsylvania-They haven't taxed air--yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samm1148

Absolutely.


6 posted on 02/08/2007 4:17:06 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samm1148
During remarks before the Burlington (Mass.) Business Roundtable in 1994, Romney spoke like the committed reformers who later enacted sweeping national reforms in Congress.

“I understand Ted Kennedy will spend about $10 million to be reelected — he’s been in 32 years, $10 million. I think that’s wrong because — and that’s not his own money, that’s all from other people,” Romney said during the 1994 presentation, which was aired by C-SPAN. “And to get that kind of money you’ve got to cozy up as an incumbent to all the special-interest groups who can go out and raise money for you from their members. And that kind of relationship has an influence on the way you’re gonna vote.”

Romney lost his race against Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.). When he ran for governor eight years later, Romney again proposed dramatic changes to campaign-finance rules.

Hey, Mitt. It may be "other people's money," but they are covered under the First Amendment, too. You might try reading it some time soon.

7 posted on 02/08/2007 4:22:22 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

This guy's a real piece of work.


8 posted on 02/08/2007 4:24:20 PM PST by BearArms (Arm yourself because no one else here will save you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

But...but..but... He was actually against it, before he was for it, before he was against it.

We can trust him to be a conservative. (/sarc)


9 posted on 02/08/2007 4:24:59 PM PST by rwh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Is this guy just like John Kerry, or what? Is there anything he has been consistant about.


10 posted on 02/08/2007 4:32:33 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
"He's going right. Hard right. That's good. Way good. Just like Reagan."

If Mitt flips consistently to the Right, he's not a flop in my view. :-)

11 posted on 02/08/2007 4:40:09 PM PST by Unmarked Package (Amazing surprises await us under cover of a humble exterior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"Romney freely admitted that he has been firmly opposed to abortion rights for only two and a half years."

How many posts have I read on the FR that state that Mitt was always Anti-Abortion? Now he has a change of heart 2 1/2 years ago? This guy pure snake oil.

12 posted on 02/08/2007 4:40:39 PM PST by Afronaut (Supporting Republican Liberals is the Undeniable End to Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

BTTT


13 posted on 02/08/2007 4:44:48 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't vote for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Yep. By these articles you can see some people are afraid of him and really reaching for something - anything they can find. Like a 180 on a few issues will matter. Very few politicians have zero 180's.


14 posted on 02/08/2007 4:46:37 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

You forget the sarcasm tag, right?


15 posted on 02/08/2007 5:19:04 PM PST by Afronaut (Supporting Republican Liberals is the Undeniable End to Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I am not shocked. A politician acting like a politician. And one that changes over 12+ years (from the left to the right). But, to respond to all of his criticisms, I come back to same point: What did he do when was in elected office? Did he sign into law campaign finance law? The answer is no.


16 posted on 02/08/2007 5:19:58 PM PST by nowandlater (Brownback and Huckabee for Pastor of the United States...er...President...2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Like a 180 on a few issues will matter.

What's the limit? This guy is flipping on every issue that matters, and only when he started to run for President.

17 posted on 02/08/2007 6:36:58 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nowandlater
I am not shocked. A politician acting like a politician.

That sentence would cover for anyone on anything.

18 posted on 02/08/2007 6:37:48 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Hey EV....who is your candidate?


19 posted on 02/08/2007 7:21:28 PM PST by Radix (Al would be gored in a presidential campaign............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
What was Romney's position on McCain Feingold at the time of its enactment, rather than now? The article does not discuss that little detail. Now, he seems to criticise it because it hurts the GOP, which seems a rather parochial point of view. Maybe he opposed it then for similar reasons.

Myself, I favor public financing of campaigns, in the sense that if one candidate goes over a limit, the other candidate gets 150% of the excess from the government. It is the only thing that will ever work.

20 posted on 02/08/2007 7:30:10 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson