Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rte66

Yes. The judge here in the states only ruled today that she has to give DNA for the baby on February 23rd. I wonder about the coincidence of this.


156 posted on 02/08/2007 4:02:40 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: Arizona Carolyn

Who in the world is *with* the baby right now? Somebody hired by Stern? Ye gods and little fishes.

Please, somebody somewhere with some sense and legal authority, go get that child's DNA before she disappears!


173 posted on 02/08/2007 4:22:42 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: Arizona Carolyn

"The judge here in the states only ruled today that she has to give DNA for the baby on February 23rd. I wonder about the coincidence of this."

That is interesting ... .

For being such a "good mother" ... I wonder why the baby was NOT with her. Isn't the little girl only four months old?


262 posted on 02/08/2007 8:49:47 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson