The 43rd Co-president and Co-Excellency of the USA
The 44th Co-Presidents of the USA
Posted on 02/08/2007 9:53:11 AM PST by Reagan Man
In his next to last State of the Union Address, President Bush once more called for the irresponsible, self-destructive immigration policy of mass amnesty.
The President unfortunately showed he has learned nothing from the bitter debate that has churned throughout the nation for the past few years. The "decider in chief" has decided upon the wrong immigration stance, once more.
Even worse, he continued to strain credulity -- and stretch thinner his credibility. In the bad old days, President Bill Clinton visited upon himself a credibility crisis by blatant, arrogant abuse of language, even fudging on the meaning of "is."
Now the current President won't shoot straight on how he would deal with illegal aliens. All President Bush said was that "we need to resolve the status of the illegal immigrants who are already in our country -- without animosity and without amnesty." He then again called for "comprehensive immigration reform" -- a euphemism he has repeatedly used for mass amnesty of every last illegal alien.
To conservatives who thought they were getting someone who wouldn't play word games with the American people, President Bush has been a disappointment when immigration is the subject. He just will not plainly admit that to legalize and give eventual U.S. citizenship to at least 12 million law-breaking foreigners now among us is pure and simple amnesty.
'Chain Migration'
The Bush amnesty plan would supposedly "take pressure off the border" by "establish[ing] a legal and orderly path for foreign workers to enter our country to work on a temporary basis."
But this is only a half-truth. He failed to mention that the "temporary" work program he has in mind would not be temporary at all. Every illegal alien already here will get a "temporary" visa.
Those same illegal aliens are then rewarded with an eventual green card and later citizenship. All would be allowed to sponsor their extended family members in lengthy "chain migration." There's no reason to think those chain migrants would act any differently from the third of current legal immigrants who sneak into America illegally and live here unlawfully until their green card number comes up.
While "they won't have to try to sneak in," most certainly will. The only way to process all those illegal aliens and their distant relatives in a lawful and orderly way is with visa quotas and reasonable screening procedures. The only alternative is to open the borders to all comers -- hardly a law-and-order proposition.
To have heard President Bush, you'd think we have no temporary work visas. But we have about 10 types already. They work out with different degrees of success, and each has its share of problems and unintended consequences.
For example, H2As are for foreign agricultural workers. Yet, agriculture is the occupational sector employing the most illegal aliens. H1Bs allow in skilled workers who regularly displace skilled Americans in fields such as high-tech.
The President also fibbed about his administration's commitment to enforcing immigration laws faithfully. He said: "To secure our border, we are doubling the size of the Border Patrol and funding new infrastructure and technology."
Yet this administration is trying to weasel out of building a border fence, which Congress plainly called for. President Bush favors a "virtual fence," which really means the illegals sneak across open land, some expensive technology detects them, and Border Patrol agents have to try to catch them inside our country before they disappear.
"We will enforce our immigration laws at the worksite and give employers the tools to verify the legal status of their workers." Really? When? We already have employer sanctions laws that President Bush has been lax in enforcing.
This administration has steadily turned a blind eye toward the jobs magnet. Only a handful of companies have received sanctions. In the big-headline raids of the past year, the public wasn’t told that most of the illegal aliens arrested were released within a few hours.
This administration even pared back sending employers "no-match" letters when it became embarrassing to have the public learn that -- as HUMAN EVENTS has often pointed out -- hundreds of thousands of aliens are working under fake or stolen Social Security numbers. Tens of thousands even use the obviously bogus Social Security number of 000-00-0000. But Bush does nothing.
Congress made a now-10-year-old electronic employment verification program available to employers nationwide nearly four years ago, but participation remains voluntary.
Mr. President, please quit the word games. Start doing your duty by starting finally to enforce the immigration laws already on the books.
[Mr. Edwards, coauthor of The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform, is an adjunct fellow with the Hudson Institute.]
As far as I am concerned this is an issue of national security.
"we need to resolve the status of the illegal immigrants who are already in our country -- without animosity
I have lots of animosity. I have animosity for most politicians. I have animosity for the illegals here who don't have to follow laws. I have animosity for the simple fact that my small city in California is slowly being turned into a crime infested third world toilet.
How's that for animosity Mr. President?
That does it, I'm sitting out this election.
It's almost like turning back the clock 20 years.
This one single issue will spell out a Hillary win I'm afraid.
Yes. This article is dead on. We don't need any more stinking laws. We need a leader who will ENFORCE the laws we have.
My one issue criteria is ILLEGAL AMNESTY/IMMIGRATION/SEALING THE FREAKING BORDERS. And let a dang border gaurd shoot someone in the butt when he needs it.
He is going to need double the Border Patrol since he supports jailing those who enforce the Federal Laws on illegal immigration, especially those engage in drug smuggling.
We are overrun with Mexicans here in mid-Missouri. Dock builders, lawn and garden crews, etc., are 100 percent Mexican around Lake of the Ozarks.
|
"This one single issue will spell out a Hillary win I'm afraid."
I'd rather be assualted by a known enemy than stabbed in the back by an assumed ally.
There are differences between the amnesty Reagan signed in 1986 and the one Bush will sign into law before he leaves office. In 1986, 2.7 million illegals were granted amnesty. On the condition that tough provisions for employer sanctions were enforced. With up to a million fine on employers. Today the figure is at least 12-15 million illegals. With the 20/20 hindsight of history staring him in the face, Bush wants to make an even bigger mistake today then Reagan made 20 years ago.
Fact is, The anti immigration Conservatives are playing more word games than anyone else.
First it is "I'm not against legal immigrants, I'm just against Illegal ones or "what part of illegal don't you get" (Translation, I don't want the brown skin mexicans here but I won't say that, instead I will say "no illegals"
Then it is "multiculteralism has always been a failure", (translation: caucasian immigrants are good, others are bad)
Then it is "we need to close the southern border due to terrorism" (translation: the environmentalists could not sell green so they came up with "you are all going to die with global warming", I could not sell keep the mexicans out so I will try "you are all going to die if you don't seal the border")
Then there is "illegals are uninsured motorists" (translation: I'm really clever to point this out because they can't get drivers licenses and they can't get insurance, I can't lose with this argument !)
Finally it is "we can't have legal temporary workers because that is amnesty (translation: Oh crap, I can't be against illegals because they will be legal, now I'm going to have to admit that I don't want the mexicans here and people will call me racist)
Isn't there an old saying about 'better the devil you know ,than the devil you don't' ?
For those who say that Rudy's views on abortion or gun control don't matter - if Bush were on the right side of the amnesty issue, there would be no immigration "reform", even with the Dems in control of the House and Senate.
Instead, we will see amnesty this year because Bush is on the wrong side of this issue and will sign the bill instead of vetoing it.
So if the Dems get an itch to control guns again or repeal the PBA ban, who do you want in the Oval Office? A guy holding a pen? Or a veto stamp?
The 43rd Co-president and Co-Excellency of the USA
The 44th Co-Presidents of the USA
True and all have been wordsmithing the issue. I don't know why Bush has such a disdain for enforcing our laws. In large part because of their positions on illegal immigration, I will not vote for McVain or Giuliani in any election.
Calling conservatives racists, simply because they want the borders secured, employer sanctions enforced and a halt to welfare handouts to illegals, is not the right way to make your case. Falsehoods don't work. A little honesty goes a long way. Try it.
Frankly, your post is kinda silly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.