Thanks for spelling out the obvious.
Now is State Dept. going to buy them up from N. Korea?
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...
2 posted on
02/08/2007 3:29:19 AM PST by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, kae jong-il, chia head, pogri, midget sh*tbag)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The article is plausible, but the illustration is far-fetched.
Containers are always stowed in the fore and aft position, with the container doors facing aft. The illustration shows the containers stowed athwartship.
Also, a twelve meter missile in a standard forty foot container is a very tight squeeze.
What the article did not make explicit is that a commercial vessel, even with a North Korean flag, can loiter close off shore without arousing suspicion.
We need to bring back the "Q" ships!
6 posted on
02/08/2007 7:17:14 AM PST by
ThirdMate
To: TigerLikesRooster
7 posted on
02/08/2007 8:04:21 AM PST by
darth
To: TigerLikesRooster; Jet Jaguar; monkapotamus; All
OH LORDY this too funny ROFL LMAO that so Cold War era CHIA PET ROFL
8 posted on
02/08/2007 8:24:06 AM PST by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: TigerLikesRooster
I wish RONALD REAGAN, a REAL President, able to STAND UP TO THESE GUYS--and stop this Six Party Talks Crap--were alive and President again.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson