Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At Libby Trial, Russert of NBC Gives and Gets
NY Times ^ | 2/07/07 | Neil Lewis and David Johnston

Posted on 02/07/2007 9:01:22 PM PST by advance_copy

WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 — The prosecution in the perjury trial of I. Lewis Libby Jr. neared the end of its case Wednesday with a final dramatic flourish — putting Tim Russert of NBC News on the witness stand to deliver what could be a serious blow to Mr. Libby’s defense.

Nevertheless, Mr. Russert, who is accustomed to asking tough questions of his guests on “Meet the Press,” found himself in the clearly uncomfortable role of being the subject of tough questions during a cross-examination by Mr. Libby’s defense lawyer.

Mr. Russert, whose signature technique in interrogating officials on his television program includes confronting them with documents and texts of previous quotes, found the technique used on him. A defense lawyer displayed documents on a large television screen in the courtroom as he challenged Mr. Russert’s recollection of events.

The cross-examinationis expected to conclude on Thursday. He is the last of 10 witnesses who testified in 10 days of trial in which the prosecution has tried to show that Mr. Libby lied repeatedly to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents and a federal grand jury about how he learned about the Central Intelligence Agency operative at the heart of the leak case.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benveniste; cialeak; fitzfong; libby; meetthedepressed; mrpotatohead; plamegate; richardbenveniste; russert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Mr. Russert, the moderator of “Meet the Press,” was unequivocal in his testimony that no such conversation with Mr. Libby occurred. But when Mr. Libby’s chief defense lawyer, Theodore V. Wells Jr., began his efforts to disparage Mr. Russert’s reliability in cross-examination, Mr. Russert’s confident demeanor changed abruptly.

NY Times gives its take on the Potato-head testimony.
1 posted on 02/07/2007 9:01:24 PM PST by advance_copy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Hope Russert wears a diaper tomorrow!


2 posted on 02/07/2007 9:03:17 PM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

I envy the jurors being spared having to hear about the Buffalo Bills.


3 posted on 02/07/2007 9:04:20 PM PST by AcesFullMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

This is all so much ado about nothing. Yawn.

Fitzfong couldn't prove that Plame was covert, so he's doing his perjury trap thing. I hope that he's ground into pulp in the public's eye for what he's done to a loyal patriot in Libby, and I hope it starts with either an acquittal or a pardon.


4 posted on 02/07/2007 9:13:18 PM PST by Kryptonite (Keep Democrats Out of Power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
NY Times: spin, spin, spin !!

After the prosecution concludes its case, Mr. Libby’s lawyers will face a daunting task in trying to undo it. The prosecutor, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, has offered a straightforward case in which the jurors have heard from numerous witnesses supporting the charges against Mr. Libby.

Unlike the infant NY Times readers who need their facts run through a blender on puree, some of us have actually been watching this trial. In fact almost every witness has been effectively countered by the defense who have shown that they can not recall details, have misstated facts, and have changed their stories in the years since the events took place. The case is anything but straitforward, and the witnesses have been obviously led by the prosection, and have held up poorly under cross examination.

Is there reasonable doubt? COULD Scooter Libby have simply mis-remembered which person told him the not very secret factoid that Ms. Plame was a society-spy? YES! Absolutely. Has the prosectuion shown beyond a reasonable doubt the Mr. Libby LIED, and did not simple remember things differently. NO, in my opinion, they have NOT.

Thus I believe, based on the public testimony, that he will be found NOT GUILTY, or at least get a hung jury.

The NY Times is a dispicible propaganda piece for socialists, and are not to be trusted to report the news fairly.

Remember Jason Blair!

Remember Walter Duranty

5 posted on 02/07/2007 9:38:14 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black; kristinn; A Citizen Reporter; AliVeritas; alnick; AmeriBrit; AmericaUnited; arasina; ...
NY Times Scooter Spin!!!
6 posted on 02/07/2007 9:40:02 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thanks for all the pings, Howlin! They really save me a lot of time having to search for the interesting reports.
7 posted on 02/07/2007 9:42:49 PM PST by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

The prosecution is wrapping up its case and we have yet to see the defense begin ITS case, so I would say things are looking pretty good for Scooter right now.


8 posted on 02/07/2007 9:44:12 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
Should be "not having to search!"
9 posted on 02/07/2007 9:44:27 PM PST by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Bump and *sigh*


10 posted on 02/07/2007 9:44:46 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Why isn't Fitz charging all of his own witnesses with perjury for poor testimony?


11 posted on 02/07/2007 9:50:52 PM PST by weegee (No third term. Hillary Clinton's 2008 election run presents a Constitutional Crisis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne

Glad to do it; I keep hoping one of you all will write a real long synopsis so I can finally get the WHOLE picture here.......LOL.

They're coming fast and furious now!


12 posted on 02/07/2007 9:51:58 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"...said Richard Ben-Veniste, a prominent lawyer in Washington who has attended the trial."

Now there's a scumbag we haven't heard from in a while..... as a leading "fixer" for the Demagogues, Ben Veniste could very well be one of the people who have manipulated this Plamegate fiasco behind the scenes. I wonder, is he attending the trial out of mere curiosity as a private citizen (I wonder how many zillion-dollar-per-hour DC attorneys ever attend trials with which they have no professional involvement), or has he been "involved" in this case for a long time? I suspect the latter, merely based upon his unexpected appearance, but of course I have no idea how this scumbag currently spends his days and nights.
13 posted on 02/07/2007 9:58:02 PM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

and the one he was so adamant about contradicts his statemtne to the FBI early in the timeline.


14 posted on 02/07/2007 10:05:11 PM PST by Ingtar (Guliani, McCain, Clinton. A nut sandwich on fake conservative bread. Choice is an illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

What, no crutches on the way out? He's been healed! Thank the Lawd, he been healed!


15 posted on 02/07/2007 10:34:15 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Hope Russert wears a diaper tomorrow!

LoL!

16 posted on 02/07/2007 10:46:46 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the pings, Howlin. I would miss some of these if it weren't for you.


17 posted on 02/07/2007 11:08:26 PM PST by MNbelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Richard Ben-Veniste is a Clintonoid sycophant of the first magnitude. In the 9/11 Commission hearings, I was incensed when he tried to cut off Condoleezza Rice to improperly frame her answer about Richard Clarke's overblown Bin Laden memo. That's why whenever I hear the name Ben-Veniste, I think "Bent-Peniste."
18 posted on 02/08/2007 1:07:47 AM PST by L.N. Smithee (We're all two heartbeats away from President Nancy Pelosi. Sleep tight, America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
"Mr. Russert, who is accustomed to asking tough questions of his Republican guests on “Meet the Press...”

There - fixed it...

19 posted on 02/08/2007 3:36:15 AM PST by DJ Frisat (SPAM: best in the can and in sammiches -- not for use on computers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee; Howlin
Thanks for the ping, Howlin!

Let's not forget that Ben-Veniste was also heavily involved in the impeachment hearings against Richard Nixon. I would not be surprised if he and Mrs. Clinton had a master plan to get Cheney and then go after President Bush. Like others, I would not be surprised if he is coordinating with Fitzgerald.

20 posted on 02/08/2007 4:04:42 AM PST by Miss Marple (Prayers for Jemian's son,: Lord, please keep him safe and bring him home .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson