Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfstar
And to confuse the issue, during the 1880's the Fed.gov started a system of health checks which if one failed, would cause one to be 'denied entry'. It was mandatory, and anyone not landing at a formal entry point was fined or jailed.

But there was no quota system (except from China-Japan-Asia) for any group till the 1920's.

531 posted on 02/07/2007 11:07:00 PM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]


To: investigateworld
And to confuse the issue, during the 1880's the Fed.gov started a system of health checks which if one failed, would cause one to be 'denied entry'. It was mandatory, and anyone not landing at a formal entry point was fined or jailed.

That occurred at ports of entry, not on our land borders. In fact, the current configuration of our land borders didn't come into existence until February 14, 1912, when Arizona became the last of the 48 contiguous states to join the union. Oklahoma had joined in 1907, and New Mexico January 6, 1912.

No fencing or controlled entry points on our land borders with Canada and Mexico existed until recently in our history. So to repeat, our land borders have always been wide open and people have flowed freely across them in both directions throughout most of the time the U.S. has existed.

I say this not to excuse what has been happening over the last 20 years since President Reagan signed the first (and so far only) genuine amnesty for illegal immigrants in our history, but to explain it in part.

557 posted on 02/08/2007 8:16:32 AM PST by Wolfstar ("A nation that hates its Horatios is already in grave danger of losing its soul." Dr. Jack Wheeler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson