Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bornacatholic

I was referring to questioning the editing of her remarks in general, and said the blackgenocide site was being brought into question. Since you are determined to pick a fight, I'll let you take that as error. :)


67 posted on 02/08/2007 12:17:04 PM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: linda_22003; BlackElk; sitetest
I don't think it is a gaffe; I think that when the sentence is read to the end, including "and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea", she's making it clear that the idea of "extermination" is a mistaken idea.

47 posted on 02/08/2007 6:50:49 AM PST by linda_22003

*Huh, ok. I get it :)

When selected quotes are rhetorically reframed in an attempt to make Sanger look less culpable, you do not demand a link to a documented citation, but when selected quotes from Sanger are incontrovertibly damning, then the demand for a documented citation is requested - and then rejected because it comes from a cite which opposes abortion.

Remind me, sister..when a citation is rejected because of its source, what is that logical fallacy labelled?

Happy researching, sister. I don't have to do anymore. I got the answer I was looking for :)

68 posted on 02/08/2007 12:35:12 PM PST by bornacatholic (I am the Catholic Cassius Clay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson