Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Yes,Sanger was a racist eugenecist but her thinking at that time was right in the mainstream of American thought.


59 posted on 02/08/2007 11:30:32 AM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Riverman94610
...mainstream of American thought.

Nonetheless, expediency caused Sanger to distance herself from her radical past; for instance, she used soft phrases such as "family planning" instead of her original, more pointed argument that the poor were being manipulated into producing an endless supply of cheap labor. She also adopted the mainstream eugenics language of the day, partly as a tactic, since many eugenicists opposed birth control on the grounds that the educated would use it more. Though her own work was directed toward voluntary birth control and public health programs, her use of eugenics language probably helped justify sterilization abuse. Her misjudgments should cause us to wonder what parallel errors we are making now and to question any tactics that fail to embody the ends we hope to achieve.

*That is Gloria Steinem writing in Time mag in 1998.

How "mainstream" was she if she had to fake it for the, um, mainstream?

62 posted on 02/08/2007 11:52:05 AM PST by bornacatholic (I am the Catholic Cassius Clay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson