Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Assault
I used punched cards for years and last year we had the choice of a touch screen or paper ballots. Most people chose paper. Paper is faster. Anybody who ever took a standardized test, which would be practically every voter by now, can just jump right in and vote without a lot of instruction.

I don't know why they ever used touch screens in the first place. The election officials fell for a sales pitch and a slick gimmick.

9 posted on 02/07/2007 4:25:52 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Anti-Bubba182
I don't know why they ever used touch screens in the first place. The election officials fell for a sales pitch and a slick gimmick.

People who are blind can use touch-screen machines without assistance (and thus without letting anyone know how they're voting). On the other hand, even places that use optical-scan ballots could handle blind voters by simply having a touch-screen machine that places marks on a paper ballot as directed by the voter; the paper ballot would then be counted the same as any other.

10 posted on 02/07/2007 4:28:34 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson