In saying this he implicitly denies that you have rights. If he's for majority decisions in different areas, then he's saying that there isn't any fundamental right that supersedes the tyranny of the majority.
Georgia, I never thought of it that way. Good point. And having to be the victim of a crime to demonstrate need to have a weapon is stoopid. What if you don't 'make it' through the criminal act due to being unarmed?