Replies

IMHO, this is one issue where FR is kidding itself. he said he believes in the 2nd amendment. he said he will appoint judges like scalia and roberts when it comes to abortion. he is in favor of states rights!!!

you people need to understand that new york city is not like the rest of the country and you cannot govern NYC the way you would govern the rest of the country. i am a reagan republican and from what i am seeing rudy is the only one who can win the republican ticket. if you continue to chastise him you should get ready to repeat one phrase over and over:

PRESIDENT HILLARY.

i am a new york city cop and believe it or not, i am no fan of rudy. he did a lot to put us back decades in terms of a police force. but he did get results because he was so powerful of a mayor. all i am saying is give the man a chance.

"i am a new york city cop and believe it or not, i am no fan of rudy. he did a lot to put us back decades in terms of a police force. but he did get results because he was so powerful of a mayor. all i am saying is give the man a chance."

He has a chance. He is welcome to be the liberal mayor of any liberal big city he wishes. If he is term limited out of NYC he can try another one. Chicago perhaps? That is a liberal sewer and I don't think he could screw it up any worse than it is.

I just don't want his gun grabbing, queer loving, baby killing, a$$ within 500 yards of the Republican Platform.

No thanks. I pray this "powerful" social liberal who doesn't understand American traditional conservative values and who admittedly doesn't respect the constitution or our God-given unalienable rights doesn't win the nomination and never comes anywhere close to the oval office.

I say admittedly because I listened very carefully to what he said on Hannity & Colmes and there is a transcript - remove your blinders, read, and comprehend the thing. It's straight from the horses mouth. There is no doubt about it. He's proud to be an abortionist, gay rights supporting gun control freak and he says there's no doubt about who he is and what he believes in and he knows that many conservatives won't vote for him because of it. Again, read the transcript. He's not at all worried about losing the conservative vote because of his social liberal positions and if you honestly believe that he will appoint strict constructionists and or resist the socialist agenda, much less advance the conservative cause, you are the one fooling yourself.

C'mon, the man proudly bills himself as a social liberal. What do you think a social liberal is? Hint, he's not a conservative. Why do you try to deny his positions? He clearly states where he stands. He's for a "woman's right to choose," he's okay with half delivering, poking a sharp instrument into and sucking a helpless innocent unborn baby's brains out, for gay rights and for "regulating" guns. Constructionist judges? Sheesh, the man thinks Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a strict constructionist. Give us a break!

By the way, why do you think he's not worried about losing the conservative vote and not worried about admitting his social liberal ideology? It's because he hopes to attract millions of social liberals to his side. And what does that do to our conservative cause if he's elected? Think about it.