To: Petronski
Lying about what? It's a quote. They are your words. Including the shabby, absurdly irrelevant "sarcasm tag." How about the last sentence, which also makes it clear that it was a tongue in cheek response to an obnoxious liberal poster who was trying to paint all conservatives as bigots and "homophobes?"
793 posted on
02/07/2007 8:22:59 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
("With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?")
To: EternalVigilance
How about the last sentence, which also makes it clear that it was a tongue in cheek response to an obnoxious liberal poster who was trying to paint all conservatives as bigots and "homophobes?"It doesn't.
The second sentence reads:
Or, at the very least, they should use it on all their campaign stuff.
There is no indication from you whether you intend they be forced to do this, as you would have them be forced to wear the triangle.
803 posted on
02/07/2007 8:31:41 PM PST by
Petronski
(Who am I and why am I here?)
To: EternalVigilance
How about the last sentence, which also makes it clear that it was a tongue in cheek response to an obnoxious liberal poster who was trying to paint all conservatives as bigots and "homophobes?" If you were referring to me (and I have NEVER registered any objection to your graphic) ...but you and I agreed almost point by point on homosexuals.
So who is the "obnoxious liberal poster who was trying to paint all conservatives as bigots and "homophobes?"
I'd really like to know.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson