Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalmom
Honor and character are not "trivialities".

So if Hillary Clinton had honor and character, but still wanted to ban guns, nationalize health care, pull out of Iraq, and raise taxes, you'd support her?

He doesn't honor the law, as he wants to legalize millions of criminal aliens.

That's a non sequitur... if the aliens were "legalized", how would that not be in accordance with the law? Does advocating a change in the law now constitute dishonor to the law?

I won't vote for him, and his nomination would be the last straw forcing me to switch parties after voting Republican since I was 18.

Have a good long heartfelt chat with a Nader voter before you take such a step. They didn't really care much for Al Gore and undoubtedly most of them cared for John Kerry less... but a whole lot of 'em changed their mind between 2000 and 2004.

325 posted on 02/07/2007 4:28:36 PM PST by Politicalities (http://www.politicalities.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalities

Honor and character are not the only criteria, but I WON'T vote for someone without them.

Legalizing them is bypassing the required punishment for invading this country, and rewarding them for it instead.
Why don't actual citizens get any of these tax breaks and so on that are being offered to illegals?

I won't vote for him. Period. If the Republican party doesn't even stand for the beliefs it purports, then I am done with them.


342 posted on 02/07/2007 4:33:03 PM PST by Politicalmom ("Always vote for principle...and your vote is never lost."-John Quincy Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson