"I'll let you guys in on a little secret... I kind of like the National Firearms Act of 1934 and I'm not wholly opposed to the Gun Control Act of 1968. I like the fact that hoops must be jumped to purchase a fully-automatic weapon. I like the fact that if you try to purchase an arsenal capable of supplying a small army, people at the federal level will take interested notice."
Well thanks for letting us all know you stand on the side of the brady bunch and liberals on this issue.
I'm on the side of Truth and Reason. This means that sometimes I've got some weird lefties standing with me, sometimes I've got some weird righties standing with me, but nearly all of the time neither extreme stands with me. The "brady bunch and liberals" would surely not approve of my stance on waiting periods, trigger locks, handguns, and concealed carry.
Now, since you've declared that my position on this issue doesn't align with yours, please consider the following scenario:
"Abu al-Rashid, a 23-year-old Muslim male and an active member in a Muslim prayer group, places an order for and takes delivery of one hundred cheap Chinese fully-automatic rifles, as well as a large stockpile of ammunition, and maybe some grenades."
Should the federal government know about this activity? Should it investigate it? Should it put a stop to it? Or would to do so be an infringement of al-Rashid's right to keep and bear arms?