To: Jim Robinson
I would like someone to explain to me how killing a child after it's already gone through the birth canal could possibly save the life of the mother. By then the delivery is done and if it were going to threaten the mother's life, it would have already done so.
I'm serious. I would like someone to address this.
22 posted on
02/07/2007 1:29:52 PM PST by
alnick
To: alnick
It can't. As I've pointed out on other threads, the procedure actually increases the risk to the mother, because the baby has to be in the breach position.
The exceptions claimed by the pro-abortion spokespeople are out-and-out lies.
To: alnick
I agree with YOU!! Late term pregnancies which threaten a mothers life, are delivered vis cesarean birth, NOT abortion!
59 posted on
02/07/2007 2:16:03 PM PST by
gidget7
(2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
To: alnick
I would like someone to explain to me how killing a child after it's already gone through the birth canal could possibly save the life of the mother. By then the delivery is done and if it were going to threaten the mother's life, it would have already done so. Bears repeating. I always ask this of people who are for abortion.
129 posted on
02/07/2007 6:25:27 PM PST by
It's me
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson