Asking U.S. to pull out of agreement gets OK [Security and Prosperity Partnership]

Deseret News ^ | February 7, 2007 | Deseret News

[hedgetrimmer]

NAFTA will kill us,

If you think that, why are you always defending it? LOLOL!

[hedgetrimmer]

biometric passports are globalist + The International Civil Aviation Organisation defines the biometric standards to be used in passports

LOLOLOL! You're catching on! LOLOLOL

[justshutupandtakeit]

Brainfever strikes another legislature. When will it end, stay tuned.

[1rudeboy]

Gosh, you are obtuse. The person who believes it is the person who you pinged yourself in your reply. See why I say you all are just plain funny?

[hedgetrimmer]

The person who believes it is the person who you pinged yourself in your reply.--The epitome of an obtuse statement. LOLOLOL

[hedgetrimmer]

You said so yourself --

biometric passports are globalist
39 posted on 02/08/2007 6:39:30 AM PST by 1rudeboy

[justshutupandtakeit]

Adjust your fire it was apparently misdirected.

[1rudeboy]

She's shelling her own troops. [chuckle]

[1rudeboy]

You are losing focus. Let's backtrack. We can return to the issue of passports later.

"The person who believes it is the person who you pinged yourself in your reply."--The epitome of an obtuse statement. LOLOLOL [quotation marks added, as that portion of the comment is mine]
45 posted on 02/08/2007 9:35:08 AM CST by hedgetrimmer
_____
Gosh, you are obtuse. The person who believes it is the person who you pinged yourself in your reply. See why I say you all are just plain funny?
44 posted on 02/08/2007 9:14:49 AM CST by 1rudeboy
_____
NAFTA will kill us,
If you think that, why are you always defending it? LOLOL!
41 posted on 02/08/2007 9:11:00 AM CST by hedgetrimmer
_____
Oh, yes . . . let me summarize:
NAFTA will kill us, and
biometric passports are globalist.
I'm not going to go back and find any others. Two will suffice.
39 posted on 02/08/2007 8:39:30 AM CST by 1rudeboy
_____
So if an epidemic breaks out in Mexico City, we won't close our borders (heaven forbid we interfere with the failure, NAFTA). We must even the playing field and give everyone a chance at the pandemic. Sarcasm/ Oh, the stupidity of the free traders.
4 posted on 02/07/2007 9:34:03 AM CST by texastoo [excerpted]

Note that the subject at hand is the murderous nature of NAFTA, as you acknowledge in your comment #41. Note also that you ping the holder of that view in your replies.

[1rudeboy]

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that you two are allies, but rather that she's having a "ready, fire, aim" moment.

[hedgetrimmer]

Note that the subject at hand is the murderous nature of NAFTA

These are your words and yours alone.

NAFTA will kill us,

Are you particularly worried?

biometric passports are globalist + The International Civil Aviation Organisation defines the biometric standards to be used in passports

There! You said it all.

[1rudeboy]

Are you saying that I'm mischaracterizing the murderous nature of NAFTA, as posited by someone else, by describing it as a "NAFTA will kill us" reaction? Please, walk me through your reasoning . . . I need the laugh.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Read the SPP and you will find that the border will NOT be closed due to an epidemic.

I just looked and didn't see anything backing up your assertion. I don't suppose you have a link?

[1rudeboy]

It's right there, just after the section on vitamin supplements.

[kactus]

Funny you should mention Stakeholder. I just attended a Stakeholder meeting here on the railway. It's all about transparency(farce). There were about thirty attendees there and we heard a railway presentation, a power point.

To ask a question you are to write it down on a form and it will be adressed at the next Stakeholder meeting..in 3 weeks.
One landowner asked verbally, "Will the Union Pacific be signing options for easements during this three week period?"
Answer by "Port Authority": "Write that down on your slip of paper. That's a real good question."

The reason you haven't heard about Arizona is Arizona doesn't even know about it. That's how transparent this is. We would not have known a thing if it wasn't running right through us!

[texastoo]

Will the Union Pacific be signing options for easements during this three week period?" Answer by "Port Authority": "Write that down on your slip of paper. That's a real good question."

ROFL

If I understand correctly, one can't fight the railroad as they basically have eminent domain rights to your property from years ago. Will this in Arizona involve foreign ownership and toll roads?

[kactus]

The rail is backed by Chinese $$$ like the port.

An LLC is going to own the power plant in Mexico.

I don't know who is backing the natural gas line, but a Canadian Company is planning it.

Roads in Arizona are still to be figured out on how to finance them. Tolls are possible, so is long term financing. The state is looking into various ways to pay for the roads. The article never ever mentioned CANAMEX though.

If Mexican customs on TTC is in Kansas City, I wonder where Mexican customs will be on the CANAMEX.

[Czar]

As I said earlier, anything having to do with preliminary steps toward an NAU needs to be killed in the crib. The NWO/Globalist elites have been working very hard to sneak this past American citizens by getting as much of it as possible into place so it's a fait accompli by the time what has been going on is widely understood.

Kill it now.