Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Bates
It is really pathetic that some people are surrendering that early. Hillary Clinton is not Bill Clinton. She almost has zero charisma, but even worse she is mean and nasty, and worst of all she cannot hide her nastiness and meanness and no matter what the liberal media tries to help her they can hide her nasty and mean character.

When she speaks with this incredibly annoying voice you hear nastiness. You look at her face and you see those mean scary wide open eyes rolling in her face. She has a very b**chy laughter. Even before they know her extreme left wing politics and her incredible flip flops, the majority of voters will quickly realize that she is very mean and nasty and they will be quickly turned of by her. Nasty and mean women are much less acceptable to the public than nasty and mean men.

I live in Massachusetts, the most liberal state in the union, and many liberals I talk to, including young single liberal women, cannot stand Hillary Clinton, and they also mention to me that she is too nasty and mean. People who believe that women will be flocking to vote for Hillary Clinton are very wrong because women are much more critical of another woman than they are of another man.

I am not saying that Hillary Clinton should be taken lightly, but to say that she is unbeatable is an extreme exaggeration and in fact it is a big lie. I do not think the Republicans need to go and dig in her scandals and past life to beat her, let the American public listen and watch her to know her nasty and mean character and that by itself will take 51% of voters away from her.

98 posted on 02/07/2007 6:25:52 AM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jveritas
let the American public listen and watch her to know her nasty and mean character and that by itself will take 51% of voters away from her.

I think you've discovered the reason Obama Yo-mama slapped her pony so early- exposure, and lots of it. Contrast his "articulate, and clean" personna to Hilda's.

Her response to the "evil men" dig was revealing: not at all comfortable with minor criticism, especially from her media.

This woman is strung way-too-tight to endure the pace and rigours of leading the pack into the final turn ("it's the spotlight, stupid"). Early to mid '08, I predict snappage that'll have her bouncing off padded walls in some publicly funded health facility somewhere.

175 posted on 02/07/2007 7:16:32 AM PST by budwiesest (It takes a lot of balls to golf the way I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas

Hillary used to be able to put on a pretty good "Girl Next Door" (cack!) act but I haven't seen it in a while. She was trying and ended up implying Bill was a violent evil man. I should think the "end the war in Jan 2009" and "take the oil company profits" (all of them) would have killed the candidacy in the cradle, but she's still going.


182 posted on 02/07/2007 7:22:09 AM PST by ichabod1 ("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson