And even that doesn't make sense. Why on earth would a former ambassador be sent to investigate illegal sales? Of course this must have been Novak's train of thought as well-"How did Wilson get picked?"
It seems pretty clear the CIA listend to Valerie.
The significance here is (if true), even THAT statement by Wilson was wrong.
I don't see much significance here either. So what if he was wrong, he wasn't asked till after both actions took place, the VP did ask that SOMEONE be sent, even though the CIA had already been asking. So what? Don't get me wrong, I know Wilson was a lying SOB, but this doesn't seem significant to me.
Hardly the only example. Another was the idea that Wilson said he had told the administration that he found no evidence of Niger selling yellowcake to Iraq, even though he reported hearing that an Iraqi official had been seeking a deal to purchase Yellowcake - which is exactly what the administration claimed.
What if LIBBY sent him and the prosecution to Libby is Cheney's PAYBACK??? HAHAHAHHAAHH