To: MinorityRepublican
nobody is forcing them to live in cities.
nobody is forcing liberal cities to enact rent controls that drive up prices.
There are plenty of places where the land is cheap, the air is clean, and there's plenty of space to roam.
However I'd prefer liberals stay in the cities.
2 posted on
02/06/2007 10:24:43 PM PST by
flashbunny
(<---------- Hate RINOs? Click my name for 2008 GOP RINO collector cards.)
To: flashbunny; All
No one forcing people to live in.....
That is what some of us say about people who live where there are floods,huricanes, tornados, etc.
and the tax payers of Calif. and others pick up the tab for the people who lose their homes to lose them again in another year over and over
15 posted on
02/06/2007 10:49:42 PM PST by
SoCalPol
(We Need A Border Fence Now)
To: flashbunny
Same here. I live in the same house I've lived in for well over 30 years and I don't see any reason to downsize, upsize, or any other damn "size". This must be something peculiar to young people--or those dumb enough to feel like they HAVE to live in a big city, but I don't think it necessarily means the American Dream has been "downsized" It's alway been a choice, and it still is.
32 posted on
02/07/2007 1:27:01 AM PST by
singfreedom
("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
To: flashbunny
There are plenty of places where the land is cheap, the air is clean, and there's plenty of space to roam. And there are no jobs....
49 posted on
02/07/2007 10:28:24 AM PST by
Cogadh na Sith
(There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
To: flashbunny
There are plenty of places where the land is cheap, the air is clean, and there's plenty of space to roam.
Are there jobs in these places? As the writer of the article mentioned, that option is available, but at the expense of a long commute.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson