[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

First, my respect for JulieAnnie is represented by my reference to him - get over it, it's my post.

Nice. I'm sure you heap lavish praise on Hillary Clinton, though.

Second - if that's the candidate YOU wish to support, go right ahead. BUT, and you can pass this around to all your other RINO buddies, if JulieAnnie is the GOP pick, it'll be the GOP expecting me and others to cast votes against the core beliefs that attracted us to the GOP in the first place.

If Rudy or Romney wins the primaries, you really have no case. That means that your social conservative lost the primaries fair and square.

BTW, if Hunter or any of the other candidates win, I would be more than happy to support them in the general, unlike you spoilsports who wanna throw a snit because your candidate lost.

[azhenfud]

"Nice. I'm sure you heap lavish praise on Hillary Clinton, though."

A total non-sequit.

Unlike it is for some, the GOP does not form my ideals, but those ideals are more closely matched by the GOP. When it ceases to do so, and it will with expecting I vote for JulieAnnie, I'll look elsewhere and leave the GOP to fend without my support..

[jmc813]

BTW, if Hunter or any of the other candidates win, I would be more than happy to support them in the general, unlike you spoilsports who wanna throw a snit because your candidate lost.

That is exactly why a candidate acceptable to conservatives would be a better nominee in the general. You guys are willing to compromise and vote for a conservative GOP candidate. Most anti-Rudy posters are not. Giuliani is not a pragmatic nominee.