[Thermalseeker]

You're indeed better off with someone nobody's heard of rather than someone that most of the population either hates or thinks of as a joke.

Unless you have been asleep for the past 25 years you should know beyond a shadow of a doubt that no matter who the GOP nominates they will be trashed by the laimstream media relentlessly. I personally would prefer someone who can debate from a point of knowledge and experience with a good, sound understanding of history.

[org.whodat]

I personally would prefer someone who can debate from a point of knowledge and experience with a good, sound understanding of history.

Ok lets debate history. Newt what historical importance do you place on not getting it on with the hired help while you are still married??

[bushfamfan]

"Unless you have been asleep for the past 25 years you should know beyond a shadow of a doubt that no matter who the GOP nominates they will be trashed by the laimstream media relentlessly. I personally would prefer someone who can debate from a point of knowledge and experience with a good, sound understanding of history."

Odd that people seem to be overlooking the hypocrite label Newt is hindered with. His name is dirt to the public. Funny that conservatives would want to put someone up who went out in such a disgraceful way and the public will not respond favorably to a man who acted as he did during the Clintoon-Lewinsky scandal.