Posted on 02/06/2007 2:56:14 PM PST by CutePuppy
Libby Explains Faulty Recollections
By MATT APUZZO
WASHINGTON - On grand jury audiotapes played at his trial on Tuesday, former White House aide I. Lewis Libby said he learned about a CIA officer from Vice President Dick Cheney, forgot it, then learned it again from NBC News reporter Tim Russert a month later.
The complicated history of Libby's recollections is at the heart of his perjury and obstruction trial in the exposing the identity of Valerie Plame, a CIA employee. She is married to war critic and former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
Libby's eight hours of grand jury testimony in 2004 conflicts with testimony at his trial by a former White House press secretary, a former New York Times reporter, a recent vice presidential spokeswoman, a former CIA official and a former State Department undersecretary.
All testified that Libby discussed Plame with them. Libby said in grand jury testimony that he did not remember Plame coming up in any of those conversations. Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has told jurors for weeks that Libby lied. The audiotapes will allow jurors to decide for themselves.
In them, Fitzgerald walked Libby through the Bush administration's response to Wilson's suggestion in 2003 that the government had twisted prewar intelligence about Iraq.
Libby told the grand jury he was "disturbed ... upset's a fair word I guess" by Wilson's July 6, 2003 attack on the administration in an op-ed piece in The New York Times.
As for Cheney, "I'm sure he was upset," Libby added.
To rebut Wilson's claims, Libby said Cheney told to him to leak an intelligence report saying Iraq had "vigorously begun" trying to acquire uranium from the African nation of Niger.
"The vice president instructed me to go talk to Judith Miller to lay things out for her," Libby said.
Cheney had already told Libby at this point that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, a fact that Fitzgerald says Libby relayed to Miller. Libby says he forgot all about Plame until days later, when Russert told him about it.
"I do not believe I discussed Mr. Wilson's _ Ambassador Wilson's _ wife in this conversation," Libby testified. "This was a couple of days before I talked to Tim Russert and I recall being surprised by what Tim Russert told me."
Russert is expected to testify Wednesday and will be a key witness. Libby said he called Russert to complain about NBC colleague Chris Matthews and, at the end of the conversation, Russert brought up Plame.
"Did you know that Ambassador Wilson's wife worked at the CIA?" Libby recalled Russert asking.
"No, I don't know that,'" Libby said he replied.
"Yes, all the reporters know it,'" Russert responded, according to Libby's testimony.
Russert said Plame never came up in the conversation. Fitzgerald believes Libby concocted the Russert conversation to shield him from accusations that he discussed official government information. Libby said he only repeated the information he heard from Russert.
Fitzgerald, who sounded casual in his early questioning, sounded incredulous at times later in the interview.
"You have a special recollection of remembering that you had forgotten that you knew Ambassador Wilson's wife worked at the CIA?" Fitzgerald asked.
Libby said he did not remember discussing Plame with White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, Cheney spokeswoman Cathie Martin, CIA official Robert Grenier or State Department Undersecretary Marc Grossman.
"I tend to get between 100 and 200 pages of material a day that I'm supposed to read in a day," Libby said at the end of his first grand jury appearance. "So a lot of information comes through to me and I can't possibly recall all the stuff I think is important, let alone other stuff that I don't think is as important."
Libby came back for a second appearance and said he remembered discussing Wilson's connection to the CIA with Grossman.
"He's one of yours," Libby recalled telling Grossman.
"Not one of ours, one of theirs," Grossman said, pointing toward the CIA seat in a conference room, Libby testified.
"It's a sad state of affairs when the CIA has to get their own ambassador to go to a country to ask questions about what our own ambassador could be asking about," Libby recalled saying.
Libby said it was a joke and that Wilson's wife never came up.
He said he still could not recall the conversations others said they had with him about Plame.
Associated Press writer Pete Yost contributed to this report.
"To rebut Wilson's claims, Libby said Cheney told to him to leak an intelligence report saying Iraq had "vigorously begun" trying to acquire uranium from the African nation of Niger."
Does anybody buy this?
Libby will need more than that to get out of this stupid trap. The defense will have to do a lot to undercut the mass of government witnesses who all said that Libby mentioned Plame to them.
I still think the whole thing is bogus.
*** Libby's recollections is at the heart of his perjury and obstruction trial***
This is wrong. The Democrats stab at trying to frame the Republicans in the White House and their stooge Fitzgerald is at the heart of this farce.
Why not? Wilson was out there spreading stories and the administration was trying to counter them. They could have done a much better job with it by going out and telling people that Wilson was not sent by them, that they don't know why someone of his stature was sent by the CIA and perhaps people should be asking questions why he got the job and why he is writing op-ed pieces in the NY Times?
And just who makes up the bulk of the government witnesses?
Members of the same media which declared war on this Administration before they even took office
Libby is not looking good here. His memory seems a bit selective and I am not sure a jury is going to buy it. This is not about leaking a name but rather making statements about what he said to who and then contradicting himself later.
"The vice president instructed me to go talk to Judith Miller to lay things out for her," Libby said.
"Mr russert may have some 'splaining to do."
Sorry to say, don't bet on it. Timmy-boy is a left wing puppet and will simply say he never said anything to Libby. In fact, I think Russert has already publicly stated this.
Not guilty.
"Mr russert may have some 'splaining to do."
Sorry to say, don't bet on it. Timmy-boy is a left wing puppet and will simply say he never said anything to Libby. In fact, I think Russert has already publicly stated this.
If Russert testifies, Libby's lawyer should return his fee if he can't trip him up in some inconsistency or another.
I hope you are right. I suppose all we can do is stay tuned........
It is not a crime to remember, or forget you remembered, or remember that you forget you remembered she was CIA. CIA outed her over the phone to a reporter. That is public information. You don't even have to subpoena anyone to find it out, both sides of the conversation have admitted it publicly.
She was outed by her own employer. Period. If your employer outs you on the phone, you aren't undercover, or your employer just burned you for their own purposes. Don't know which it is, but Libby has no part in this little kabuki pantomime.
Fitz does, though, and he's playing it for all its worth. Wonder what that is?
I think Libby had a fine defense that he had no intent to lie because there was no crime to cover up to begin with. His lawyers have so far gone off in different directions it will be impossible to focus on this simple defense.
"Fitz does, though, and he's playing it for all its worth. Wonder what that is?"
He's bucking for a supreme court nomination by the next president.
Yeah. That's what I gathered when I read it.
The 'unbelievable' part how it was editorialized.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.