Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Introducing Hannityspeak
RenewAmerica.us ^ | February 6, 2007 | Helen Valois

Posted on 02/06/2007 2:00:28 PM PST by EternalVigilance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-388 next last
To: Peach

Empty, meaningless spin.


41 posted on 02/06/2007 2:30:32 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I'm supporting Hunter at this point. The fifth columnists are not helping him. On purpose, I might add.


42 posted on 02/06/2007 2:31:03 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
RenewAmerica is part of Alan Keyes' web of organizations and a mouthpiece for his views.

But I do suggest that everyone take the time to read all of the articles posted to it, so that they can see what else is posted there; it will prove to be quite enlightening!

43 posted on 02/06/2007 2:31:22 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I believe that life is sacred and should not be treated as a commodity. I believe that the institution of marriage needs to be preserved. For now at least, good judges are best way to protect the institution of marriage and move America closer to the day when a debate on the local level can begin again about the value of human life. In order for us to have this debate in state legislatures we must win the next fight over the next Supreme Court vacancy, and if we lose the next presidential election than we will have taken a major step backwards in our quest to replace the current liberal ideology on the highest bench. More than any potential Republican president, Rudy Giuliani will have the easiest time getting strict constructionists confirmed to the Supreme Court and the lower courts.

Think of four scenarios: 1) A Hillary appointment 2) A court battle in which a thinly elected Republican administration that is led by someone who is avidly pro-life faces down a probably Democratic controlled Senate 3) A court battle in which the overwhelmingly elected Republican administration is led by the Bull Moose lover himself, Mr. McCain 4) A court battle in which pro-choice Giuliani, elected and respected by a huge majority of Americans, makes the argument that strict constructionist jurisprudence is needed in the 21st century. He did after all strongly support Justice Roberts, Justice Alito, and he said that he would have made Justice Scalia Chief Justice. As important, Giuliani can actually make a personal case for a specific legal doctrine. The mayor is a former high ranking Justice department attorney who has argued before the Supreme Court.

To reclaim the Senate and Congress, to hold onto the White House, to build a sustainable Republican majority, and to advance conservative principles, we Republicans must unite together and support a candidate who can win the hearts of the vast majority of Americans.

Only when we win hearts can we then win minds.

http://www.redstate.com/blogs/dmeaton/2007/feb/04/achieving_socially_conservative_ideals_through_liberal_means_making_the_case_for_rudy


44 posted on 02/06/2007 2:31:33 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Empty, meaningless spin.

Everything is meaningless if you're a disruptor.

45 posted on 02/06/2007 2:31:55 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Since your life's work seems to be tearing down any and all potential Republican presidential candidates, I'm beginning to suspect that you are in the employ of Hillary or the DNC.

Of course, I could be wrong, but why would you do their work for them?

46 posted on 02/06/2007 2:32:18 PM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Indeed, in one recent poll, majorities of Republicans who were informed of Giuliani’s views on social issues said that they were either minor issues or no issues at all; only 16% said that they wouldn't vote for him after being informed of these views.

If you believe that, you're going to be mighty surprised over the next several months...
47 posted on 02/06/2007 2:33:02 PM PST by Antoninus ( Who is Duncan Hunter? Find out....www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
Those who make a point of trashing republicans are gonna be stuck with demonratz.

Gosh, you could have a point if these liberals like Giuliani actually were actually Republicans.

Are you aware that of 60 appointments to the courts that Rudy had available to him during his term as Mayor, NOT ONE was a Republican, much less a conservative?

48 posted on 02/06/2007 2:33:19 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Perhaps she doesn't have a spell check function.
49 posted on 02/06/2007 2:33:28 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I keep hearing all the wailing and gnashing of teeth from you, but the answer to a Rudy candidacy is for conservatives to put up a stronger Republican candidate, and Duncan Hunter ain't it.

Oh, and anyone YOU support won't win anyway. That's not hyperbole, it's based on your lousy track record.

When is Keyes announcing or is he still banging on fence posts?


50 posted on 02/06/2007 2:33:42 PM PST by Registered (Politics is the art of the possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
Of course, I could be wrong, but why would you do their work for them?

Seems to me that it's you who is doing their work for them by trying to nominate a leftist who will destroy the Republican Party.

51 posted on 02/06/2007 2:34:34 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Every FREEPER should read ALL of the articles on RenewAmerica. ;^)


52 posted on 02/06/2007 2:35:46 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I have "nominated" or come out in favor of any candidate. You're wrong about that TOO.


53 posted on 02/06/2007 2:35:52 PM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Oh, and anyone YOU support won't win anyway. That's not hyperbole, it's based on your lousy track record.

Really? All of my candidates won in November. How did the RINOs you've taken to supporting do?

54 posted on 02/06/2007 2:36:13 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Registered
What we heard from the presumptive Republican front runner was the whole set of self-contradictions one would expect from a liberal hijacking a conservative ticket: that he is "personally opposed" to abortion while upholding a "woman's right to choose;" that he defines marriage as between a man and a woman but simultaneously supports "domestic partnerships;" that he is not for "amnesty" for undocumented workers but does believe in their "regularization," meaning that those who break immigration law should become the ones who make it.

Care to dispute the core premise of the posted column? Or do you want to drag in old disputes in lieu of actually making your case?

55 posted on 02/06/2007 2:36:17 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Have NOT nominated or chosen a candidate yet.


56 posted on 02/06/2007 2:36:33 PM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
What we heard from the presumptive Republican front runner was the whole set of self-contradictions one would expect from a liberal hijacking a conservative ticket: that he is "personally opposed" to abortion while upholding a "woman's right to choose;" that he defines marriage as between a man and a woman but simultaneously supports "domestic partnerships;" that he is not for "amnesty" for undocumented workers but does believe in their "regularization," meaning that those who break immigration law should become the ones who make it.

Care to dispute the core premise of the article? Or just make personal attacks in lieu of such?

57 posted on 02/06/2007 2:37:08 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Sure - that's why he's polling higher than any other Republican candidate.


58 posted on 02/06/2007 2:37:27 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Sure - that's why he's polling higher than any other Republican candidate.

And Howard Dean was outpolling John Kerry in NH in December 2003 by 40-12.

It's waay too early to be crowing about polls.

59 posted on 02/06/2007 2:38:31 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
.. Are you aware that of 60 appointments to the courts that Rudy had available to him during his term as Mayor, NOT ONE was a Republican, much less a conservative?

Evie, you disruptor, here is my propmise. I promise to vote for the most conservative candidates in the primary and the republican in the general. No amount of resentment or anger against the fifth columnist scum or against the fringe element of the right will sway that promise. Thats a one-way street, disruptor, as you will advise the useful idiots to take their ball and go home. Regardless, thats my promise.

60 posted on 02/06/2007 2:38:40 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-388 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson