[dmw]

"Second, I like him. I can't help it. I just do."

Nothing wrong with liking Rudy, but it isn't a valid reason to vote for him. We need to put our feelings aside and think of the long term consequences of having a liberal president, especially at a time when we have liberals controlling congress.

[James Ewell Brown Stuart]

but it isn't a valid reason to vote for him

That is your opinion.

Like I said, right now I am working hard for Duncan Hunter, but I if Rudy wins the nomination, I will vote for him.

[Signalman]

Nothing wrong with liking Rudy, but it isn't a valid reason to vote for him. We need to put our feelings aside and think of the long term consequences of having a liberal president, especially at a time when we have liberals controlling congress.

OK, don't support Rudy G. because he's a "liberal". Yeah, let's nominate a "surefire winner" like Duncan Hunter. Then, instead of a liberal president, we'll have an extreme socialist/collectivist who will take your money and your property for the good of "all society", e.g. The Hildabeast.

[wouldntbprudent]

We need to put our feelings aside and think of the long term consequences of having a liberal president, especially at a time when we have liberals controlling congress.

Oh, this is rich for the "teach the GOP a lesson" crowd by not voting in a way that stops MRS BILL CLINTON. I do wish the Perfect Conservatives would put their feelings aside, think of the long-term consequences of having a liberal president, such as MRS BILL CLINTON, and vote accordingly.