[airborne]

...and there is no other Republican WHO CAN WIN the general election.

So you say. And even before the primaries you're trying to sell the Republican Party on settling for a social issue lib. NO THANKS!

Rudy has all but said that in looking to appoint justices like Scalia and Roberts...he will not be advancing any liberal social agenda through the courts.

Just more words. You can't promise that any more than Rudy can. "Strict constructionist" is the phrase I keep hearing. Look up the definition and apply it to all of the previous appointments Rudy's made. NOT ONE!!

For Republicans, there really is no other choice.

Not a single vote in a single primary has been cast, and you say that?

Pure, unadulterated BS!

[ken5050]

You know, I wrote a reasoned, calm, analysis, and you respond with a rant that, more importantly, did not address ANY of then points I raised.

I was respectful, and am supportive, of the issues that are defining to you, yet I advanced the propositiont hat the national security issue is paramount in 2008. You chose not to discuss that factor in the upcoming campaign. Why is it so hard to have a calm, rational, discussion?