One:
We weren't talking about you, or your reasoned post.
A casual review of this thread reveals who we talking about.
Two:
"Women will continue to die from cervical cancer from the remaining 16 HPV strains this vaccine won't prevent. That's a reality you choose to ignore."
Yes. But 70% or more will not.
Cutting out 70% of the cancer and 705 of the hysterectomies is a good thing.
Would 1005 be better? Sure. But 70% is a great start.
"Yes. But 70% or more will not.
Cutting out 70% of the cancer and 705 of the hysterectomies is a good thing.
Would 1005 be better? Sure. But 70% is a great start."
While I respect your faith in Merck's data, I confess I'm somewhat more of a skeptic than you.
As for the 'evil sex' remarks, regardless of the target, I don't think they add anything to the discourse. Do you?