Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani on Hannity: VIDEO AND TRANSCRIPT
YouTube, Hannity and Colmes | 2.6.07 | Mia T

Posted on 02/06/2007 7:11:58 AM PST by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last
To: fox martyr son

---"It's time to look forward. What we're facing is the most dangerous socialist presidential possibility in our history."---

Hogwash, not if we're "looking forward." Then we have to take her at her word, just like Rudy.

But that's NOT how you deal with reality. You deal with the fact that there are many Freepers with stories of how Rudy took their guns, you deal with NARAL sending more money to Rudy than to Hitlery, and with Rudy suing gun manufacturers, and with Rudy RAISING money for Pro-Abortion organizations. And with Rudy supporting gay marriage, and with Rudy saying he's not a Conservative, and with Rudy suing the government for amnesty for illegals, and with Rudy pushing for hate crimes legislation and to protect homosexuality as a civil right.

I would rather fight the enemy to keep my rights than willingly surrender them to someone professing to be on my side. Giuliani is worse for man of the causes I believe in than Hitlery - WORSE.


41 posted on 02/06/2007 8:04:09 AM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thanks. Hadn't seen the interview. Thanks to Sean and Rudy.


42 posted on 02/06/2007 8:05:30 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Rudy! Rudy! Rudy! America's mayor who is a proven warrior and results driven leader. Much much respect....


43 posted on 02/06/2007 8:06:45 AM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

That fits - one clown voting for another.

The "weight" of your critique of Rudy is a great endorsement....Thanks!


44 posted on 02/06/2007 8:06:59 AM PST by jmc0519
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Before last night's interview I thought Giuliani was a pro-abortion, gun-hating, gay-loving, amnesty for illegals liberal.

After the interview I was convinced Giuliani is a pro-abortion, gun-hating, gay-loving, amnesty for illegals liberal.

Newt '08!

45 posted on 02/06/2007 8:08:46 AM PST by garv (Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

His abortion comments are "acceptable" assuming:

-He's serious that he'd nominate Alito, Scalia, and Roberts type justices.

-He really does think of it as a "life of mother" issue and also a states' rights issue

His answer on guns was fuzzy and unimpressive. If he'd outright promise to leave it 100% to the states and just stay away from any gun control legislation, I might be OK with it.

Border Control? WTF is a technological fence?

He does "get it" on terrorism.

I wish Hannity would have brought up fiscal issues with him. Right now, I'm not sold on Rudy.


46 posted on 02/06/2007 8:09:58 AM PST by RockinRight (What I want in '08: Gingrich's politics, Reagan's appeal, and Tancredo's immigration stance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Wow! what a campaign for Hillary Clinton.


47 posted on 02/06/2007 8:11:02 AM PST by fox martyr son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

To be candid, johnny7, my opinion of Rudy predates this interview.
If I had to make a president from scratch for these perilous times, he--yes, it would be a 'he'--would look very much like Rudy.

By contrast, missus clinton could not be more unfit:

 

 

 
It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)



Clinton Administration Veteran:
"Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."

My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president.

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics, Berkeley
clinton Administration veteran

Hillary Clinton?
Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man?


Thank you, Gavin McNett, for your tribute to the incomparable Tammy Wynette. (TAMMY WYNETTE, 1942-1998) Too many pundits, usually leftist and privileged, sneer at country music. To these critics, any music created by poor, Southern whites (at least those poor, Southern whites who didn't attend an Ivy League university) must be held in contempt, along with its correlatives: incest, racism and trailer parks. Hillary Clinton? Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man? Where would she be now if she as a child had to pick cotton from sun up to sun down? Tammy Wynette stands alone, a legend; and she will be admired wherever people appreciate the honesty of the human experience. Human beings are vulnerable. We all should be thankful to any artist courageous enough to bare her soul on the public stage so the rest of us who are listening and know whereof she speaks might benefit.

Sean Smith
Fresno, Calif.
Salon.com


December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans, Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005, 2007







COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007


48 posted on 02/06/2007 8:11:25 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Put Newt on the ticket and i'll take it.


49 posted on 02/06/2007 8:12:10 AM PST by chad_in_georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

bump


50 posted on 02/06/2007 8:12:16 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ryan71
Rudy is one of the most aggressive advocates of gun control in the country, Democrat or Republican. He's the driving force behind the private investigation of and filing lawsuits against gun dealers which has been interfering with federal investigations, and has been gathering a group of mayors nationwide pushing for further restrictions on the right to arms.

March 2, 1997 - Mayor Giuliani's WINS Address

... And even as we grieve for the families and our hearts and prayers go out to them, perhaps we can use this senseless tragedy to re-energize the fight for gun control.

If Mr. Abu Kamal would have tried to buy a gun in New York, he would not have been able to do so. Because in New York our gun control laws are much stricter and more responsible than in Florida.

To purchase a gun in the State of New York you have to give your full name, your date of birth, your residence, your occupation. You have to prove that you're a United States citizen, you have to show you are of good character, competency and integrity. And you have to demonstrate a real need for the weapon.

And thanks in part to our stricter gun control laws, crime is down dramatically in New York City. Shootings are down over 50 percent. Murder is down over 50 percent. But the fact is that 90 percent of the guns we take out of the hands of criminals in New York City come from out of the State of New York.

We need a federal law that bans all assault weapons, and if in fact you do need a handgun you should be subjected to at least the same restrictions -- and really stronger ones -- that exist for driving an automobile.


51 posted on 02/06/2007 8:12:35 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fox martyr son

---"Wow! what a campaign for Hillary Clinton."---

Six of one, half a dozen of the other....


52 posted on 02/06/2007 8:14:44 AM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

You need to post that on every Rudy fetish thread.


53 posted on 02/06/2007 8:17:37 AM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: chad_in_georgia

I have thought that too. Esp. if he let Newt act as an advisor to him.


54 posted on 02/06/2007 8:19:06 AM PST by RockinRight (What I want in '08: Gingrich's politics, Reagan's appeal, and Tancredo's immigration stance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fox martyr son
The fact that both Giuliani and Hillary Clinton have embraced the same position on an issue that so deeply split Congress in 1993 -- and caused political problems for the Democratic White House -- reflects the extent to which both of the Senate hopefuls view gay men and lesbians as a source of votes and contributions.

Both Hillary Clinton and Giuliani already have gone to some lengths to court support from gay voters, and Hillary Clinton's advisers said they were concerned that the mayor might do well among a group of voters that has historically been viewed as a reliable part of the Democratic base.

At the fund-raiser, Hillary Clinton also voiced support for domestic partnership measures that would allow gay partners to receive the same benefits as married couples.

On this, her position is similar to the one taken by Giuliani, who supported a domestic partnership law in 1997. The mayor frequently remarks that he signed the city's first domestic partnership legislation.

Link

55 posted on 02/06/2007 8:23:19 AM PST by Afronaut (Supporting Republican Liberals is the Undeniable End to Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thanks for the post. I missed the interview during the Jack Bauer Power Hour. Looking forward to finally being able to vote for Rudy. Living in NJ only means we could appreciate his hard work in NYC. The first time I have agreed with Dick Morris in a very very long time...if ever.


56 posted on 02/06/2007 8:31:58 AM PST by Wright Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
...the fact that there are many Freepers with stories of how Rudy took their guns...

Uh... Rudy didn't take away the guns. NYC already *had* gun control when Rudy became mayor. People's only beef can be that he didn't *undo* gun control in NYC.

Sure, I wish he'd done that I suppose. But now he's not mayor and he's running for President. What matters now is what he'd do about guns at the national level. He made it clear that he doesn't have a federal agenda about guns. It's a state and local issue for him, and I would agree with that.

Maybe somebody can calibrate me on this, but wasn't it Rudy that brought back concealed weapon permits in NYC after Dinkins had all but wiped them out?

57 posted on 02/06/2007 8:33:40 AM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
And even Rudy says Rudy thinks there should be gay marriage.

Just not true. You made that up. He's clearly said that marriage is about a man and a woman. Only.

Beyond that, I don't give a rat's ___ what the next President thinks about gays. Or abortion for that matter. They're just not important issues for the oval office. The venue for those things will be elsewhere. The Presidents opinion will not matter.

58 posted on 02/06/2007 8:39:12 AM PST by Ramius ([sip])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wright Wing

Morris was blown away by the interview. Sometimes, things are obvious. This is one of those times.


59 posted on 02/06/2007 8:40:34 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
. What matters now is what he'd do about guns at the national level. He made it clear that he doesn't have a federal agenda about guns. It's a state and local issue for him, ...

Are you sure?

From the 1997 speech excerpted above:

"We need a federal law that bans all assault weapons, and if in fact you do need a handgun you should be subjected to at least the same restrictions -- and really stronger ones -- that exist for driving an automobile."

Are you ready for a federal law that makes you prove that you "need" a gun in order to buy a gun, like the law Rudy praises in New York?

60 posted on 02/06/2007 8:40:45 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson