Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IslandJeff
Actually, I have gone over that pretty carefully, and while he maintains he only wants a "life of the mother" exception, he previously wanted a "health of the mother" exception, which is the old trick they've been using for years to allow any abortion at any time (they simply include "mental health").

The law does, in fact, have a life of the mother exception:

This subsection [imposing penalties] does not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.

The courts have been striking it down on the fact that it doesn't have a "health of the mother" exception.

And, anyone who has studied the issue knows that partial birth abortion is never necessary to preserve either the life or the health of the mother.

174 posted on 02/05/2007 6:25:44 PM PST by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts

I'm in favor of the life ot the mother exception.

In fact, I'm in favor of the 3 exceptions.


207 posted on 02/05/2007 6:31:39 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson