Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
I do understand that, Jim. What I don't understand is why placing a de facto vote for hillary is somehow viewed as the less repugnant option.

Vote third party, sit home, and you are placing a de facto vote for someone who will not only kill babies in the womb, she will, with her dangerous and self-serving policy, kill generations of babies not yet even imagined.

An additional irony: This is a woman who wants to crush the religious right.

WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY:
CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS


AFTERWORD: A Note to the Religious Right

1,289 posted on 02/06/2007 12:09:18 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1272 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T
You're throwing up a ridiculous straw man argument. I'm not voting for Hillary or staying home or voting third party. But I am trying to alert some of you to the evil you are wishing on our nation. The Republican Party is the opposition party to the abortionist, gay agenda, gun-grabbing, God denying, Democrat socialist Party. I want American liberty and our traditional American conservative value system to live on long after we defeat the foreign enemy. We cannot defeat evil by joining it. We have plenty of pro-life conservatives that we can back for the Republican nomination. We can't save the nation or the party by emulating the domestic enemy.
1,301 posted on 02/06/2007 12:23:02 AM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson