Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Minnesoootan

"Reverse Scientific Method:
1)Draw your conclucion.

2)Select data,no matter how flawed,to support you conclusion.

3)Discard any data,no matter how valid,which does not."

There are a number of scientific discoveries based on this approach. You might be surprised by that, but brilliant men knew what the principle should be and when the data didn't fit they found reasons why it didn't fit. So they didn't throw away good data, but bad data in order to get to the truth. Sometimes this method is needed to have progress, although before you publish the results you go back and redo the study the correct way.


17 posted on 02/05/2007 12:41:11 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Kirkwood
There are a number of scientific discoveries based on this [Reverse Scientific method] approach. You might be surprised by that, but brilliant men knew what the principle should be and when the data didn't fit they found reasons why it didn't fit. So they didn't throw away good data, but bad data in order to get to the truth. Sometimes this method is needed to have progress, although before you publish the results you go back and redo the study the correct way.

The scientific method says nothing about how you come up with a theory or hypothesis. You can use taro cards and still follow the scientific method. What is important is that you devise and carry out a proper experiment. Good scientists often have an intuitive knack for insights into bad results but good luck getting confirming results from those taro card theories.

26 posted on 02/05/2007 1:25:18 PM PST by etlib (No creature without tentacles has ever developed true intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson