Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Delphinium

You'd rather run a hardcore conservative who has no chance in November then a moderate Republican who can win? I understand sticking to your principals, but sometimes that isn't always the most logical course of action. Rudy isn't always right on social issues, but is on record as saying he'll appoint judges in the mold of Alito and Roberts which mitigates that risk in my eyes. We're coming into an imperfect election where there isn't going to be 100% satisfaction with whoever the Republican nominee is, but the one that is quite clear is that if the Dems win, we're all going to lose...conservatives, moderates, etc.


70 posted on 02/05/2007 11:28:10 AM PST by rhc2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: rhc2000
You'd rather run a hardcore conservative who has no chance in November then a moderate Republican who can win?

yes I'd rather have a candidate that adheres to the "Republican platform"

If you call that hardcore conservative, and unwinnable then you must be in the wrong party.

It's been working for years without a problem. We lose one election and many of you start running scared. We don't need a man who in his own words brags that his policies are almost the same as Bill Clintons.
96 posted on 02/05/2007 11:36:58 AM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson