Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xrp

"Sure is a good thing a "compassionate" conservative got elected in 2000.

Bush is a worthless sack."

Yeah, I agree. Really sucked that Bush was left with a recession then had to deal with the economic realities of 9/11. Yet despite this, still has managed to reduce the deficit over the last three years, despite spending on all those worthless education and health care programs.

I knew I should have voted for Al Gore. /sarcasm


16 posted on 02/05/2007 8:01:28 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz

The conservative revolution of 1994 led by House Republicans is DEAD. All that is left is "Hey, we're not as bad as that other party".

If spending patterns from 94-98 remained the same, there wouldn't be any deficit to cut in half, and we could have additional tax cut rates.

Further this issue is more than a matter of deficits. The conservative revolution was supposed to be about devolving power and control away from the federal government. There is no sign of that anymore.

Conservatism does not mean having Republicans rather than Democrats running a bloated federal bureaucracy that seeks to continually exert control over every aspect of our lives. No Child Left Behind is a perfect example of that-"we're going to run education but we'll do it right because we're Republicans". Wrong. education is the purview of local control, and the trend should be toward reducing the Fed's control. That's true conservatism - not just voting against Al Gore.


34 posted on 02/05/2007 8:42:18 AM PST by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson