Heresies always serve the greater good of the Church because God draws the good of truth out of the evil of heresy while extinguishing any errors attached to it and we layman end-up seeing the pellucid truth even clearer.
It is interesting to me that you here are engaged in a not dissimilar work.
You are doing the work of the Church in the secular realm by clarifying the facts and letting the light of truth burn-off the dross of calumny leveled against Christian Prelates by enemies of the Church. God Bless you, sir. Thank you.
I know you know your good work will not go unpunished :)
Already the guilt-by-association charges abound...
Thank my brother in Christ, bornacatholic
Hatred and deep bigotry is behind the slanderous campaign against His Holiness, Pius XII, and the Catholic Church.
In 1942, Croatia's Jews were being brutally persecuted by the Nazi-installed dictatorship. On August 4, Chief Rabbi Miroslav Freiberger of Zagreb, Croatia's capital, sought more assistance from Pius XII. Already, the Vatican's unofficial diplomatic representative in Croatia, Msgr. Joseph Marcone, who was acting on Cardinal Maglione's instructions, and Archbishop Alois Stepinac opposed the anti-Jewish persecutions. In his letter, Chief Rabbi Freiberger appreciated "the limitless goodness that the representatives of the Holy See and the leaders of the Church showed to our poor brothers." (Actes, VIII, p. 611). Throughout the war, the Chief Rabbi continued to express his gratitude to the Vatican for helping Croatian Jews.
Pius XII and the Vatican opposed the forced conversion to Catholicism of Orthodox Serb and Croatians as strongly as they opposed the persecution of Orthodox Serbs and Gypsies by the pro-Nazi regimen of the new created state of Croatia.. The Holy See did expressly repudiate the forced conversions in a memorandum dated January 25, 1942, from the Vatican Secretiat of State to the Yugoslavian Legation.
Professor Ronald J. Rychlak in his book Hitler, The War and the Pope discredited most of the falsehoods used by enemies of The Church in order do defame His Holiness Pius XII and the Holy See.
One of the most controversial was the meeting of Pius XII and the fascist dictator of the newly created Croatian State, a puppet regimen obedient to Hitler dictates. On 18 May 1941, Pope Pius XII received the head of the Croation fascist state, Ante Pavelic.
While the Vatican had received Pavelic as an individual Catholic, not as head of state, there were political implications as a result of this reception. Before his reception, the Yugoslav minister to the Holy See brought to the Vaticans attention Pavelics involvement in committing atrocities against the Serbs and protested the reception of Pavelic in any capacity because he was the head of an illegitimate puppet state.
Subsequently, Pavelic's regime was responsible for the massacre of hundreds of thousands of Serbs, Jews, gypsies, and partisans. It is not known how the Pope reacted to these atrocities. Are there any archival materials that can illuminate this issue?
Many unanswered questions also surround the Archbishop of Zagreb, Aloysius Stepinac, beatified in 1999. While in 1941 he initially welcomed the creation of a Croatian state, he subsequently condemned atrocities against Serbs and Jews and established an organization to rescue Jews. Are there any archival documents or materials from the beatification process that can illuminate this matter?
Professor Rychlak explained the background and consequences of the encounter of Pius XII with Pavelic.
Croatia came into being during the war. On March 25, 1941, Italy, Germany, and Yugoslavia signed an agreement bringing Yugoslavia into the Axis. Two days later, a group of Serbian nationalists seized control of Belgrade and announced that they were siding with the Allies. As a result, Hitler invaded Yugoslavia. Croat Fascists then declared an independent Croatia. The new Croat government was led by Ante Pavelic and his supporters, the Ustashe.
There had been a long history of hatred in this part of the world between Croats (predominantly Catholic) and Serbs (mainly Orthodox). The Ustashi government exacted revenge against the Serbs for years of perceived discrimination. According to some accounts, as many as 700,000 Serbs were slaughtered. Among the charges against the Catholic Church in Croatia are that it engaged in forcible conversions, that Church officials hid Croat Nazis after the war, that Nazi gold made its way from Croatia to the Vatican, and that Catholic leaders in Croatia supported the governments brutality toward the Serbs.
While some of these charges are recent in origin (and from suspect sources), there is no credible evidence that the Pope or the Vatican behaved inappropriately. For instance, the Vatican expressly repudiated forcible conversions in a memorandum, dated January 25, 1942, from the Vatican Secretariat of State to the Legation of Yugoslavia to the Holy See (addressing conversions in Croatia).
In August of that year, the Grand Rabbi of Zagreb, Dr. Miroslav Freiberger, wrote to Pius XII expressing his most profound gratitude for the limitless goodness that the representatives of the Holy See and the leaders of the Church showed to our poor brothers. [Actes et Documents, vol. VIII, no. 441. See also id. vol. VIII, no. 537 (report on Vatican efforts to alleviate the sad conditions of the Croatian Jews); id. vol. VIII, no. 473 (efforts to find sanctuary for Croatian Jews in Italy); id. vol. VIII, no. 557 (insistence on a benevolent treatment toward the Jews).]
In October, a message went out from the Vatican to its representatives in Zagreb regarding the painful situation that spills out against the Jews in Croatia and instructing them to petition the government for a more benevolent treatment of those unfortunates. In December 1942, Dr. Freiberger wrote again, expressing his confidence in the support of the Holy See.
The Cardinal Secretary of State=s notes reflect that Vatican petitions were successful in getting a suspension of dispatches of Jews from Croatia by January 1943, but Germany was applying pressure for an attitude more firm against the Jews. Maglione went on to outline various steps that could be taken by the Holy See to help the Jews.
Another instruction from the Holy See to its unofficial representatives (since there were no diplomatic relations) in Zagreb directing them to work on behalf of the Jews went out on March 6, 1943. On September 24, 1943, Alex Easterman, the British representative of the World Jewish Congress, contacted Msgr. William Godfrey, the apostolic delegate in London and informed him that about 4,000 Jewish refugees from Croatia were safely evacuated to an island in the Adriatic Sea. I feel sure that efforts of your Grace and of the Holy See have brought about this fortunate result, wrote Easterman.
Croatian Archbishop Alojzij Stepinac originally welcomed the Ustashi government, but after he learned of the extent of the brutality, and after having received direction from Rome, he condemned its actions. [The British Minister to the Holy See during the war years, Sir Francis DArcy Osborne, wrote that Stepinac always acted according to the well-intended dictates of his conscience.] A speech he gave on October 24, 1942, is typical of many that he made refuting Nazi theory:
All men and all races are children of God; all without distinction. Those who are Gypsies, Black, European, or Aryan all have the same rights.... for this reason, the Catholic Church had always condemned, and continues to condemn, all injustice and all violence committed in the name of theories of class, race, or nationality. It is not permissible to persecute Gypsies or Jews because they are thought to be an inferior race.
The Associated Press reported that by 1942 Stepinac had become a harsh critic of that Nazi puppet regime, condemning its genocidal policies, which killed tens of thousands of Serbs, Jews, Gypsies and Croats. He thereby earned the enmity of the Croatian dictator, Ante Pavelic.
Although Cornwell argues that the Holy See granted de facto recognition to the Ustashi government, in actuality the Vatican rebuked Pavelic and refused to recognize the Independent State of Croatia or receive a Croatian representative. [Actes et Documents, vol. IV, no. 400 (Pavelic is furious... because... he is treated worse by the Holy See than the Slovaks).] When Pavelic traveled to the Vatican, he was greatly angered because he was permitted only a private audience rather than the diplomatic audience he had wanted. He might not even have been granted that privilege, but for the fact that the extent of the atrocities that had already begun were not yet known.