Skip to comments.
About that level playing field (ANTI-SMOKING JIHADISTS RUN WILD AS VICTORY NEARS)
Star Newspapers ^
| February 4, 2007
| Tom Houlihan
Posted on 02/04/2007 9:26:55 AM PST by Chi-townChief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
To: Just another Joe; Alter Kaker
That's what I thought. You ask me for a citation and I attempt to give you one. I even apologise for a mistake I made.
I ask you for a citation and am ignored.
It's a one way street, eh?
All right, show me your PROOF that ETS causes harm to an otherwise normal healthy adult.
Until then, you can ask all you want. You will be ignored the same way you ignore others.
61
posted on
02/06/2007 6:19:03 AM PST
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: SheLion
Ohio's law officially took effect on December 7th, but a lawsuit by a tavern owner's group forced the state to defer enforcing it until the rules were actually written in detail.
Some bars in the (southeast suburban Cleveland) area are enforcing it voluntarily. The one I work at will not until we are forced to. Our business is way up....since we are the ones respecting the wishes of our customers.
When "anti-smoking" initiatives pass, it proves that their are times that "democracy" does not equal liberty. It should be noted which of the two was the true cause of the Founders.
-Eric
62
posted on
02/19/2007 6:10:25 AM PST
by
E Rocc
(Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
To: Just another Joe
During the 1990s, antismoking zealots pushed OSHA for a permissable exposure limit (PEL) on ETS. When OSHA pointed out that the "bad" chemicals in ETS already had PELs, and that normal ETS levels did not even come close to exceeding them, they not only quit pushing for a PEL but now attempt to deny the validity of the concept.
When discussing occupational chemical exposure, denying the validity of PEL is like trying to talk about electricity while denying the importance of voltage.
-Eric
63
posted on
02/19/2007 6:15:43 AM PST
by
E Rocc
(Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
To: E Rocc; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; ...
Ohio's law officially took effect on December 7th, but a lawsuit by a tavern owner's group forced the state to defer enforcing it until the rules were actually written in detail.Some bars in the (southeast suburban Cleveland) area are enforcing it voluntarily. The one I work at will not until we are forced to. Our business is way up....since we are the ones respecting the wishes of our customers.
When "anti-smoking" initiatives pass, it proves that their are times that "democracy" does not equal liberty. It should be noted which of the two was the true cause of the Founders.
Thanks for the ping! I am originally from Ohio, and I just can't believe what is happening there.
64
posted on
02/19/2007 6:50:07 AM PST
by
SheLion
(When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
To: SheLion
I did not ask to join any ping list, do not ping me again.
65
posted on
02/19/2007 7:00:23 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson