Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyop

Best scenario would be for a multi-pronged, simultaneous hit on iran, syria, and the pakistani tribal areas. And not just military targets. In syria, all damascus power, transportation, and military infrastructure, in pakistan every village along the border followed by boots on the ground, in iran all manufacturing, refining, military, and hydro. Until they all cry "unconditional surrender."

But we won't do it, because our application of force isn't pre-emptive. Instead, there will be cruise missile and bombs on ied factories and several of the nuke sites in iran alone.


15 posted on 02/04/2007 4:02:47 AM PST by gotribe (There's still time to begin a war in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gotribe

The application of force you suggest would not, in fact, be "pre-emptive" as I'm sure you will agree. Iran has been at war with the US since 1979. Force has been used by both sides, mainly covert by the Iranians. I agree, it is long past time that the US openly engage the enemy.


16 posted on 02/04/2007 4:09:01 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson