Skip to comments.
Poor Darwin's false religion
WorldNetDaily ^
| February 3, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern
| Pat Boone
Posted on 02/03/2007 1:02:43 PM PST by Tim Long
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last

Pat Boone, King of Metal, gets it right.
1
posted on
02/03/2007 1:02:45 PM PST
by
Tim Long
To: Tim Long
This same crap article was already posted last week. Pat Boone should stick to what he does best -- covering R&B tunes badly and without attribution to the original artists.
2
posted on
02/03/2007 1:05:53 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Tim Long
My apologies. Apparently Pat Boone has actually written two ill-informed, incomprehensible anti-science screeds in the span of one week.
Here is the other. Pat Boone is as literate on evolution as Barbra Streisand is on energy policy.
3
posted on
02/03/2007 1:10:21 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Tim Long
4
posted on
02/03/2007 1:13:07 PM PST
by
microgood
To: Alter Kaker
Nice response. Now the anti-science zealots will post images of a brain, a cross-section of the human body along with arguments that has not been published in any half-decent science journal.
To: Tim Long
Yet another journalist who failed high school science attempting to get in a word. How about actually addressing the predictions of and evidence for theories of evolution by natural selection? Nah, too much brainpower required.
6
posted on
02/03/2007 1:18:17 PM PST
by
billybudd
To: Tim Long
Pat Freakin' Boone!
I guess THAT settles it once and for all!
7
posted on
02/03/2007 1:18:53 PM PST
by
wireman
To: raj bhatia
 |
Here's the brian. Which is as far as I got before the writer's block set in. |
8
posted on
02/03/2007 1:30:21 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite
B-R-A-I-N.
Oh, that's going to leave a mark.
9
posted on
02/03/2007 1:31:49 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Tim Long
But in a fascinating book, John Myers' "Voices from the Edge of Eternity," we find the detailed personal account of Lady Hope, of Northfield, England, who visited the aging scientist often at his bedside during his last days. It's too long to recount well here, but she tells of the Bible he was reading constantly and of the worship services that took place regularly in the summerhouse in his garden. She says that when she brought up the controversy still raging between believers in the Genesis account of creation and the growing group of scientists and teachers dismissing that account in favor of his "The Origin of Species" and related theories, he seemed distressed. And "a look of agony came over his face as he said 'I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time about everything. To my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them.'"
Pat should stick to singing.
From Index to Creationist Claims:
Darwin renounced evolution on his deathbed. Source:
Response:
- The story of Darwin's recanting is not true. Shortly after Darwin's death, Lady Hope told a gathering that she had visited Darwin on his deathbed and that he had expressed regret over evolution and had accepted Christ. However, Darwin's daughter Henrietta, who was with him during his last days, said Lady Hope never visited during any of Darwin's illnesses, that Darwin probably never saw her at any time, and that he never recanted any of his scientific views (Clark 1984, 199; Yates 1994).
- The story would be irrelevant even if true. The theory of evolution rests upon reams of evidence from many different sources, not upon the authority of any person or persons.
Links:
Greig, Russell, 1996. Did Darwin recant? Creation 18(1): 36-37. http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/1315.asp
Yates, Simon, 1994. The Lady Hope story: A widespread falsehood. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hope.htmlReferences:
- Clark, Ronald W., 1984. The Survival of Charles Darwin: A biography of a man and an idea. New York: Random House.
- Yates, Simon, 1994. (see above)
Further Reading:
Clark, Ronald W., 1984. The Survival of Charles Darwin: A biography of a man and an idea. New York: Random House.
10
posted on
02/03/2007 1:35:03 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Tim Long; All
FYI to Mr. Boone, the "Lady Hope" story of Darwin's deathbed recantment is (like the rest of this article) a complete fabrication.
Don't trust me on this -- even the creationists agree that the Lady Hope story is nonsense. "Answers in Genesis" says, "It... appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people.
11
posted on
02/03/2007 1:38:37 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Alter Kaker
"Recantation" not "recantment." Forgive me, English is not my native tongue.
12
posted on
02/03/2007 1:40:02 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Tim Long
To: Tim Long
14
posted on
02/03/2007 1:46:46 PM PST
by
fivecatsandadog
(Don't let reality ruin your day.)
To: Coyoteman
The story of Darwin's recanting is not true. Shortly after Darwin's death, Lady Hope told a gathering that she had visited Darwin on his deathbed and that he had expressed regret over evolution and had accepted Christ. However, Darwin's daughter Henrietta, who was with him during his last days, said Lady Hope never visited during any of Darwin's illnesses, that Darwin probably never saw her at any time, and that he never recanted any of his scientific views (Clark 1984, 199; Yates 1994).
And even if he had, so what? Evolution is science - whether Darwin continued to believe it or not matters as much as whether Newton continued to believe in gravity.
To: raj bhatia
As the anti Bible zealots continue to deny the Word.....
16
posted on
02/03/2007 1:51:42 PM PST
by
Axlrose
To: Axlrose
As the anti Bible zealots continue to deny the Word..... Yeah, that three-quarters of the planet's population who aren't Christian are a bunch of losers.
17
posted on
02/03/2007 1:55:14 PM PST
by
wireman
To: microgood
I love that clip. "You're the retarded offspring of five monkeys having butt sex with a fish squirrel." ROFL!
To: Alter Kaker
Pat Boone is as literate on evolution as Barbra Streisand is on energy policy. You may be giving him too much credit.
19
posted on
02/03/2007 1:58:02 PM PST
by
freespirited
(What about Dingell-Norwood?)
To: Axlrose
As the anti Bible zealots continue to deny the Word.....I can't speak for anybody else, but I'm not anti-Bible. The Bible is a religious text, it isn't a textbook.
20
posted on
02/03/2007 1:59:07 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson