Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poor Darwin's false religion
WorldNetDaily ^ | February 3, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern | Pat Boone

Posted on 02/03/2007 1:02:43 PM PST by Tim Long

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Pat Boone, King of Metal, gets it right.

1 posted on 02/03/2007 1:02:45 PM PST by Tim Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

This same crap article was already posted last week. Pat Boone should stick to what he does best -- covering R&B tunes badly and without attribution to the original artists.


2 posted on 02/03/2007 1:05:53 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
My apologies. Apparently Pat Boone has actually written two ill-informed, incomprehensible anti-science screeds in the span of one week.

Here is the other. Pat Boone is as literate on evolution as Barbra Streisand is on energy policy.

3 posted on 02/03/2007 1:10:21 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
Why I believe in evolution
4 posted on 02/03/2007 1:13:07 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Nice response. Now the anti-science zealots will post images of a brain, a cross-section of the human body along with arguments that has not been published in any half-decent science journal.
5 posted on 02/03/2007 1:13:11 PM PST by raj bhatia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

Yet another journalist who failed high school science attempting to get in a word. How about actually addressing the predictions of and evidence for theories of evolution by natural selection? Nah, too much brainpower required.


6 posted on 02/03/2007 1:18:17 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
Pat Freakin' Boone!

I guess THAT settles it once and for all!

7 posted on 02/03/2007 1:18:53 PM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raj bhatia
Here's the brian.

Which is as far as I got
before the writer's block set in.


8 posted on 02/03/2007 1:30:21 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
B-R-A-I-N.

Oh, that's going to leave a mark.

9 posted on 02/03/2007 1:31:49 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
But in a fascinating book, John Myers' "Voices from the Edge of Eternity," we find the detailed personal account of Lady Hope, of Northfield, England, who visited the aging scientist often at his bedside during his last days. It's too long to recount well here, but she tells of the Bible he was reading constantly and of the worship services that took place regularly in the summerhouse in his garden. She says that when she brought up the controversy still raging between believers in the Genesis account of creation and the growing group of scientists and teachers dismissing that account in favor of his "The Origin of Species" and related theories, he seemed distressed. And "a look of agony came over his face as he said 'I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time about everything. To my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them.'"


Pat should stick to singing.

From Index to Creationist Claims:

Claim CG001:

Darwin renounced evolution on his deathbed.

Source:

Enoch, H., 1916. Darwin's final recantation. Bombay Guardian, 25 March 1916, quoted at http://www.forerunner.com/forerunner/X0724_Darwins_Final_Recant.html

Response:

  1. The story of Darwin's recanting is not true. Shortly after Darwin's death, Lady Hope told a gathering that she had visited Darwin on his deathbed and that he had expressed regret over evolution and had accepted Christ. However, Darwin's daughter Henrietta, who was with him during his last days, said Lady Hope never visited during any of Darwin's illnesses, that Darwin probably never saw her at any time, and that he never recanted any of his scientific views (Clark 1984, 199; Yates 1994).

  2. The story would be irrelevant even if true. The theory of evolution rests upon reams of evidence from many different sources, not upon the authority of any person or persons.

Links:

Greig, Russell, 1996. Did Darwin recant? Creation 18(1): 36-37. http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/1315.asp

Yates, Simon, 1994. The Lady Hope story: A widespread falsehood. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hope.html

References:

  1. Clark, Ronald W., 1984. The Survival of Charles Darwin: A biography of a man and an idea. New York: Random House.
  2. Yates, Simon, 1994. (see above)

Further Reading:

Clark, Ronald W., 1984. The Survival of Charles Darwin: A biography of a man and an idea. New York: Random House.

10 posted on 02/03/2007 1:35:03 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long; All
FYI to Mr. Boone, the "Lady Hope" story of Darwin's deathbed recantment is (like the rest of this article) a complete fabrication.

Don't trust me on this -- even the creationists agree that the Lady Hope story is nonsense. "Answers in Genesis" says, "It... appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people.

11 posted on 02/03/2007 1:38:37 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

"Recantation" not "recantment." Forgive me, English is not my native tongue.


12 posted on 02/03/2007 1:40:02 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
Pat, you're out of your ball park. Please go back to Speedy Gonzales.
13 posted on 02/03/2007 1:40:47 PM PST by Taft in '52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

14 posted on 02/03/2007 1:46:46 PM PST by fivecatsandadog (Don't let reality ruin your day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
The story of Darwin's recanting is not true. Shortly after Darwin's death, Lady Hope told a gathering that she had visited Darwin on his deathbed and that he had expressed regret over evolution and had accepted Christ. However, Darwin's daughter Henrietta, who was with him during his last days, said Lady Hope never visited during any of Darwin's illnesses, that Darwin probably never saw her at any time, and that he never recanted any of his scientific views (Clark 1984, 199; Yates 1994).

And even if he had, so what? Evolution is science - whether Darwin continued to believe it or not matters as much as whether Newton continued to believe in gravity.
15 posted on 02/03/2007 1:47:00 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raj bhatia

As the anti Bible zealots continue to deny the Word.....


16 posted on 02/03/2007 1:51:42 PM PST by Axlrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Axlrose
As the anti Bible zealots continue to deny the Word.....

Yeah, that three-quarters of the planet's population who aren't Christian are a bunch of losers.

17 posted on 02/03/2007 1:55:14 PM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: microgood

I love that clip. "You're the retarded offspring of five monkeys having butt sex with a fish squirrel." ROFL!


18 posted on 02/03/2007 1:56:38 PM PST by highimpact
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
Pat Boone is as literate on evolution as Barbra Streisand is on energy policy.

You may be giving him too much credit.

19 posted on 02/03/2007 1:58:02 PM PST by freespirited (What about Dingell-Norwood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Axlrose
As the anti Bible zealots continue to deny the Word.....

I can't speak for anybody else, but I'm not anti-Bible. The Bible is a religious text, it isn't a textbook.

20 posted on 02/03/2007 1:59:07 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson